Expression cassettes for transgenic expression of nucleic acids

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to expression cassettes and vectors which contain constitutive promoters of plants and to the use of these expression cassettes or vectors for transgenic expression of nucleic acid sequences, preferably selection markers, in organisms, preferably in plants. The invention further relates to transgenic plants which have been transformed with the expression cassettes or vectors, to cultures, parts or propagation material derived from these plants, and to the use of these plants for the production of food and animal feedstuffs, seed, pharmaceuticals, or fine chemicals.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/755,677 filed Jan. 13, 2004, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,022,272, which is a national stage application (under 35 U.S.C. §371) of PCT/EP2002/07527 filed Jul. 5, 2002, which claims benefit to German application 101 334 07.9 filed Jul. 13, 2001 and German application 101 594 55.0 filed Dec. 4, 2001 and German application 102 075 82.4 filed Feb. 22, 2001. The entire contents of each of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

SUBMISSION OF SEQUENCE LISTING

The Sequence Listing associated with this application is filed in electronic format via EFS-Web and hereby incorporated by reference into the specification in its entirety. The name of the text file containing the Sequence Listing is Revised_Sequence_List_(—)12810_(—)01171_US. The size of the text file is 470 KB, and the text file was created on Jan. 25, 2012.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to expression cassettes and vectors which contain constitutive promoters of plants and to the use of said expression cassettes or vectors for transgenic expression of nucleic acid sequences, preferably selection markers, in organisms, preferably in plants. The invention further relates to transgenic plants which have been transformed with said expression cassettes or vectors, to cultures, parts or propagation material derived therefrom and also to the use of same for the production of food- and feedstuffs, seed, pharmaceuticals or fine chemicals.

DESCRIPTION OF THE BACKGROUND

The aim of biotechnological studies on plants is the preparation of plants having improved properties, for example to increase agricultural productivity. The preparation of transgenic plants is a fundamental technique in plant biotechnology and thus an indispensable prerequisite for basic research on plants in order for the preparation of plants having improved novel properties for agriculture, for improving the quality of foodstuffs or for the production of particular chemicals or pharmaceuticals (Dunwell J M, J Exp Bot. 2000; 51 Spec No: 487-96). The natural defense mechanisms of the plant, for example against pathogens, are often inadequate. The introduction of foreign genes from plants, animals or microbial sources can enhance the defense. Examples are the protection against insects feeding on tobacco by expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin under the control of the 35 S CaMV promoter (Vaeck et al. (1987) Nature 328:33-37) and the protection of tobacco against fungal infection by expression of a chitinase from beans under the control of the CaMV promoter (Broglie et al. (1991) Science 254:1194-1197). It is furthermore possible to achieve resistance to herbicides by introducing foreign genes, thereby optimizing the cultivation conditions and reducing crop losses (Ott K H et al. (1996) J Mol Biol 263(2):359-368). The quality of the products may also be improved. Thus it is possible, for example, to increase the shelf life and storability of crop products by inactivating particular maturation genes. This was demonstrated, for example, by inactivating polygalacturonase in tomatoes (Hamilton A J et al. (1995) Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 197:77-89).

A basic prerequisite for transgenic expression of particular genes in plants is the provision of plant-specific promoters. Various plant promoters are known. It is possible to distinguish between constitutive promoters which enable expression in various parts of a plant, which is only slightly restricted in terms of location and time, and specific promoters which allow expression only in particular parts or cells of a plant (e.g. root, seeds, pollen, leaves, etc.) or only at particular times during development. Constitutive promoters are used, for example, for expressing “selection markers”. Selection markers (e.g. antibiotic or herbicidal resistance genes) permit filtering the transformation event out of the multiplicity of untransformed but otherwise identical individual plants.

Constitutive promoters active in plants have been written relatively rarely up to now. Promoters to be mentioned are the Agrobacterium tumefaciens, TR double promoter, the promoters of the vacuolar ATPase subunits or the promoter of a proline-rich wheat protein (WO 91/13991) and also the Ppc1 promoter Mesembryanthemum cryctallinum (Cushman et al. (1993) Plant Mol Biol 21:561-566).

The constitutive promoters which are currently the predominantly used promoters in plants are almost exclusively viral promoters or promoters isolated from Agrobacterium. In detail, these are the nopaline synthase (nos) promoter (Shaw et al. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12(20):7831-7846), the mannopine synthase (mas) promoter (Comai et al. (1990) Plant Mol Biol 15 (3):373-381) and the octopine synthase (ocs) promoter (Leisner and Gelvin (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(5):2553-2557) from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the CaMV35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus. The latter is the most frequently used promoter in expression systems with ubiquitous and continuous expression (Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313:810-812; Battraw and Hall (1990) Plant Mol Biol 15:527-538; Benfey et al. (1990) EMBO J. 9(69):1677-1684; U.S. Pat. No. 5,612,472). However, the CaMV 35S promoter which is frequently applied as constitutive promoter exhibits variations in its activity in different plants and in different tissues of the same plant (Atanassova et al. (1998) Plant Mol Biol 37:275-85; Battraw and Hall (1990) Plant Mol Biol 15:527-538; Holtorf et al. (1995) Plant Mol Biol 29:637-646; Jefferson et al. (1987) EMBO J. 6:3901-3907). A further disadvantage of the 35S promoter is a change in transgene expression in the case of an infection with cauliflower mosaic virus and its typical pathogenic variants. Thus, plants expressing the BAR gene under the control of the 35S promoter are no longer resistant after infection with the virus which typically occurs in nature (Al-Kaff et al. (2000) Nature Biotechnology 18:995-99).

From the range of viral promoters, the sugarcane bacilliform badnavirus (ScBV) which imparts an expression pattern similar to that of CamV has been described as an alternative to the CaMV 35S promoter (Schenk et al. (1999) Plant Mol Biol 39(6):1221-1230). The activity of the ScBV promoter was analyzed in transient expression analyses using various dicotyledonous plants, including Nicotiana tabacum and N. benthamiana, sunflower and oilseed rape, and monocotyledonous plants, here in the form of banana, corn and millet. In the transient analyses in corn, the ScBV promoter-mediated expression level was comparable to that of the ubiquitin promoter from corn (see below). Furthermore, the ScBV promoter-mediated rate of expression was assayed in transgenic banana and tobacco plants and displayed in both plant species essentially constitutive expression.

Common promoters for expressing selection markers in plants are especially the nos promoter, or else the mas promoter and ocs promoter, all of which have been isolated from Agrobacterium strains.

The use of viral sequences is often met with great reservations on the part of the consumer. These doubts are fed not least by studies which question the safety of the 35S CaMV promoter, owing to a possible horizontal gene transfer due to a recombination hot spot (Ho M W et al. (1999) Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 11:194-197; Cummins J et al. (2000) Nature Biotechnology 18:363). It is therefore an aim of future biotechnological studies on plants to replace viral genetic elements by plant regulatory elements in order to keep as closely as possible to the plant system.

Owing to the prevailing doubts with regard to viral promoters, there are extensive efforts to replace said promoters by plant promoters. However, a promoter of plant origin, which is comparable to the viral elements, has not been described as yet.

What has been described, is a plant ubiquitin promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana (Callis et al. (1990) J Biol Chem 265:12486-12493; Holtorf S et al. (1995) Plant Mol Biol 29:637-747). Contrary to the findings in the articles mentioned, some studies revealed that the Arabidopsis ubiquitin promoter is unsuitable for expressing selection marker genes and that, for this reason, its general applicability must be called into question (see comparative examples 1 and 3).

The expression pattern mediated by the corn ubiquitin promoter has been described for the Ubi-1 and Ubi-2 promoters from corn (Christensen et al. (1992) Plant Mol Biol 18(4):675-689). While the Ubi-1 promoter has good expression activity in corn and other monocotyledonous plants, it exhibits in dicotyledonous tobacco plants only 10% of the activity which had been achieved in comparable experiments using the viral 35S promoter. It was furthermore shown that the corn Ubi-1 promoter is suitable for over expression of genes in monocotyledonous plant systems and, in addition, is sufficiently strong in order to mediate a herbicidal resistance via the expression of selection markers (Christensen and Quail (1996) Transgenic Res 5(3):213-218). The Ubi-1 promoter proved unsuitable for dicotyledonous expression systems.

A comparison of the organ specificity and strength of various constitutive promoters was carried out by Holtorf (Holtorf et al. (1995) Plant Mol Biol 29(4):637-646) on the basis of stably transformed Arabidopsis plants. The study comprised, inter alia, the CaMV35S promoter, the leaf-specific thionine promoter from barley and the Arabidopsis ubiquitin promoter (UBQ1). The CaMV35S promoter exhibited the highest rate of expression. On the basis of using an additional translational enhancer (TMV omega element), it was possible to increase the rate of expression of the promoter by a factor of two to three with unchanged organ specificity. The leaf-specific thionine promoter from barley was inactive in the majority of transformed lines, while the UBQ1 promoter from Arabidopsis resulted in medium rates of expression.

McElroy and colleagues reported a construct for transforming monocotyledonous plants, which is based on the rice actin 1 (Act1) promoter (McElroy et al. (1991) Mol Gen Genet. 231:150-160). Overall, it was concluded from the afore-described studies that the Act1 promoter-based expression vectors are suitable for controlling a sufficiently strong and constitutive expression of foreign DNA in transformed cells of monocotyledonous plants.

Another constitutive promoter which has been described is the promoter of an S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase (WO 00/37662). A disadvantage here is especially a dependence of the strength of expression on the methionine concentration (see WO 00/37662; FIG. 7).

WO 99/31258 describes chimeric constitutive plant promoters which are composed of various elements of various promoters with complementary expression patterns so that combination of individual tissue specificities additively results in a constitutive expression pattern.

Ferredoxin NADPH oxidoreductase (FNR) is a protein of the electron transport chain and reduces NADP+ to NADPH. Experiments in spinach using the spinach FNR promoter fused to the GUS gene hint at a light-inducible element in the FNR promoter (Oelmüller et al. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 237:261-72). Owing to its function, a strictly leaf-specific expression pattern would have been expected for the promoter. Owing to the tissue-dependent expression pattern, the promoter would be poorly suited to expressing selection markers. Here, a selection in all tissue parts, if possible, is required in order to ensure efficient selection.

Owing to its function during photosynthesis, the promoter of the triose phosphate translocator (TPT) should be mainly leaf-specific. The cDNAs from potato (Schulz et al. (1993) Mol Gen Genet. 238:357-61), cauliflower (Fischer et al. (1997) Plant Cell 9:453-62), oilseed rape (WO 97/25346) and corn Kammerer B (1998) The Plant Cell 10:105-117) have been described. Kammerer et al. demonstrate that TPT mRNA expression in corn is strong in the leaves and the stamen. In contrast, no expression was observed in the stem or in the roots. Owing to the tissue-dependent expression pattern, the promoter would be poorly suited to expressing selection markers. Here, a selection in all tissue parts, if possible, is required in order to ensure efficient selection.

The “constitutive” promoters described in the prior art have one or more of the following disadvantages:

1. Inadequate homogeneity of expression:

The known “constitutive” promoters frequently display a different level of expression, depending on the type of tissue or cell. Moreover, the expression property is often highly dependent on the site of insertion into the host genome. As a consequence of this, the effects to be obtained by heterologous expression cannot be achieved to the same extent homogeneously in the plant. Under or over dosages may occur. This may have an adverse effect on plant growth or plant value.

2. Inadequate time profile:

The “constitutive” promoters known in the prior art often exhibit a nonconsistent activity during the development of a tissue. As a result, it is not possible, for example, to achieve desirable effects (such as selection) in the early phase of somatic embryogenesis which would be advantageous, especially here, due to the sensitivity of the embryo to in vitro conditions and stress factors.

3. Inadequate applicability to many plant species:

The “constitutive” promoters described in the prior art are often not active in the same way in all species.

4. If a plurality of expression cassettes with in each case the same “constitutive” promoter are present in an organism, interactions between said expression cassettes and even switching-off (gene silencing) of individual expression cassettes may occur (Mette et al. (1999) EMBO J. 18:241-248).

5. Promoters of viral origin may be influenced by virus infections of the transgenic plant and may then no longer express the desired property (Al-Kaff et al. (2000) Nature Biotechnology 18:995-99).

6. The public acceptance toward the use of promoters and elements from plant systems is higher than for viral systems.

7. The number of promoters suitable for expressing selection markers in plants is low and said promoters are usually of viral or bacterial origin.

8. Pollen/anther expression: The promoters mentioned (such as, for example, 35S CaMV) exhibit strong activity in the pollen or in the anthers. This may have disadvantageous effects on the environment. Thus, unspecific expression of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins resulted not only in the desired effect on feeding insects due to expression in the root but also, due to expression in the pollen, in considerable damage in the population of the Monarch butterfly which feeds predominantly on the pollen (Losey J E et al. (1999) Nature 399, 214).

An ideal constitutive promoter should have as many of the following properties as possible: (a) a gene expression which is as homogeneous as possible with regard to location and time, i.e. an expression in as many cell types or tissues of an organism as possible during the various phases of the developmental cycle. Furthermore, an efficient selection in differentiated cells (various callus phases) from a tissue culture and other developmental stages suitable for tissue culture is desired, (b) an applicability to various plant species, which is as broad as possible, and applicability to species in which it is not possible to achieve any expression using the “constitutive” promoters known to date, (c) to combine a plurality of transgenes in one plant, it is desirable to carry out a plurality of transformations in succession or to use constructs with a plurality of promoter cassettes, but without generating silencing effects due to the multiple use of identical regulatory sequences, (d) a plant origin in order to avoid problems of acceptance by the consumer and possible problems of future approval, and (e) secondary activities of a promoter in the anthers/pollen are undesirable, for example in order to avoid environmental damage, as discussed herein.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the problems and disadvantages associated with current strategies and designs and provides new tools and methods for the expression of nucleic acids.

One embodiment of the invention is directed to expression cassettes for transgenic expression of nucleic acids, comprising a promoter containing the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3 which possesses a promoter activity, or a fragment, functional equivalent or equivalent fragment thereof which possesses said promoter activity, wherein said promoter or said fragment is functionally linked to a nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically. The equivalent fragment may comprise a sequence that contains the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 or SEQ ID NO: 27. The nucleic acid sequence to be expressed may be functionally linked to one or more further genetic control sequences, or the expression cassette contains one or more additional functional elements. Transgenic expression with cassettes of the invention enables expression of a protein encoded by said nucleic acid sequence, or expression of a sense or antisense RNA encoded by said nucleic acid sequence. Preferred nucleic acid sequences to be expressed transgenically include, but are not limited to nucleic acids coding for selection markers, reporter genes, cellulases, chitinases, glucanases, ribosome-inactivating proteins, lysozymes, Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin, α-amylase inhibitor, protease inhibitors, lectins, RNAases, ribozymes, acetyl-CoA carboxylases, phytases, 2S albumin from Bertholletia excelsa, antifreeze proteins, trehalose phosphate synthase, trehalose phosphate phosphatase, trehalase, DREB1A factor, farnesyl transferases, ferritin, oxalate oxidase, calcium-dependent protein kinases, calcineurins, glutamate dehydrogenases, N-hydroxylating multifunctional cytochrome P450, transcriptional activator CBF1, phytoene desaturases, polygalacturonases, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylases, dihydroflavanol 4-reductases, chalcone isomerases, chalcone synthases, flavanone 3-beta-hydroxylases, flavone synthase II, branching enzyme Q, starch branching enzyme or combinations thereof. In addition, nucleic acid sequences to be expressed transgenically may also include the nucleic acid sequences with GenBank accession numbers U77378, AF306348, A19451, L25042, S78423, U32624, X78815, AJO02399, AFO078796, ABO44391, AJ222980, X14074, AB045593, AFO17451, AF276302, ABO61022, X72592, AB045592, or AR123356.

Preferably, the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically is a positive selection marker, a negative selection marker, a factor that gives a growth advantage, or a combinations thereof. Preferred positive or negative selection marker include proteins that impart a resistance to antibiotics, metabolism inhibitors, herbicides, biocides, proteins that impart a resistance to phosphinothricin, glyphosate, bromoxynil, dalapon, 2-deoxyglucose 6-phosphate, tetracyclines, ampicillin, kanamycin, G418, neomycin, paromomycin, bleomycin, zeocin, hygromycin, chloramphenicol, sulfonyl urea herbicides, imidazolinone herbicides, or combinations thereof.

Preferred selection markers include phosphinothricin acetyltransferases, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthases, glyphosate oxidoreductases, dehalogenases, nitrilases, neomycin phosphotransferases, DOG^(R)1 genes, acetolactate synthases, hygromycin phosphotransferases, chloramphenicol acetyltransferases, streptomycin adenylyltransferases, β-lactamases, tetA genes, tetR genes, isopentenyl transferases, thymidine kinases, diphtheria toxin A, cytosine deaminase (codA), cytochrome P450, haloalkanedehalogenases, iaaH gene, tms2 gene, β-glucuronidases, mannose 6-phosphate isomerases, UDP-galactose 4-epimerases and combinations thereof.

Positive or negative selection markers may be encoded by a nucleic acid that contains the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or 6; or the sequence of GenBank Acc. No.: X17220, X05822, M22827, X65195, AJ028212, X17220, X05822, M22827, X65195, AJ028212, X63374, M10947, AX022822, AX022820, E01313, J03196, AF080390, AF234316, AF080389, AF234315, AF234314, U00004, NC001140, X51514, AB049823, AF094326, X07645, X07644, A19547, A19546, A19545, 105376, 105373, X74325, AF294981, AF234301, AF234300, AF234299, AF234298, AF354046, AF354045, X65876, X51366, AJ278607, L36849, AB025109, or AL133315.

The nucleic acid sequence to be expressed from the expression cassette may be functionally linked to one or more further genetic control sequences, and/or one or more additional functional elements.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to vectors comprising the expression cassette of the invention.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to transgenic organisms transformed with vectors of the invention. Preferred transgenic organisms include bacteria, yeasts, fungi, animal and plant organisms. Preferred plant organisms include Arabidopsis, tomato, tobacco, potatoes, corn, oilseed rape, wheat, barley, sunflowers, millet, beet, rye, oats, sugarbeet, bean plants and soyabean.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a cell culture, plant or transgenic propagation material, derived from a transgenic organism of the invention.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to methods for transgenic expression of nucleic acids comprising transgenically expressing a nucleic acid sequence which is functionally linked to a promoter containing the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3 and has a promoter activity; or a fragment, functional equivalent or equivalent fragment thereof which possesses the promoter activity. Functionally equivalent fragments may contain a sequence such as, but not limited to the sequences of SEQ ID NO: 4 and 27. Preferably, the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed is functionally linked to one or more further genetic control sequences, and one or more additional functional elements, and transgenically enables the expression of a protein encoded by said nucleic acid sequence, or the expression of a sense or antisense RNA encoded by said nucleic acid sequence.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to methods for selecting transformed organisms comprising introducing a nucleic acid sequence coding for a selection marker to said organisms, wherein said nucleic acid sequence is functionally and transgenically linked to a promoter according to SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3, which possesses a promoter activity; or a fragment, functional equivalent or equivalent fragment thereof which possesses said promoter activity; selecting organisms expressing said selection marker; and isolating selected organisms. Preferred selection markers include nucleic acid sequences with GenBank accession numbers U77378, AF306348, A19451, L25042, S78423, U32624, X78815, AJO02399, AFO78796, ABO44391, AJ222980, X14074, AB045593, AFO17451, AF276302, ABO61022, X72592, AB045592, or AR123356, positive selection markers, negative selection markers, factors which give a growth advantage, proteins which impart a resistance to antibiotics, metabolism inhibitors, herbicides, biocides, phosphinothricin acetyltransferases, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthases, glyphosate oxidoreductases, dehalogenases, nitrilases, neomycin phosphotransferases, DOG^(R)1 genes, acetolactate synthases, hygromycin phosphotransferases, chloramphenicol acetyltransferases, streptomycin adenylyltransferases, β-lactamases, tetA genes, tetR genes, isopentenyl transferases, thymidine kinases, diphtheria toxin A, cytosine deaminase (codA), cytochrome P450, haloalkanedehalogenases, iaaH gene, tms2 gene, β-glucuronidases, mannose 6-phosphate isomerases, UDP-galactose 4-epimerases and combinations thereof.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to methods for the production of a foodstuff, a feedstuff, a seed, a pharmaceutical or a fine chemical comprising propagating the transgenic organism of the invention or cell cultures, parts or transgenic propagation material derived therefrom. Optionally, methods further comprise growing the transgenic organism and isolating the foodstuff, feedstuff, seed, pharmaceutical or fine chemical. Preferred fine chemicals include, but are not limited to enzymes, vitamins, amino acids, sugars, saturated or unsaturated fatty acids, natural or synthetic flavorings, aromatizing substances and colorants. Preferred pharmaceuticals include, but are not limited to an antibody, enzyme or pharmaceutically active protein.

Other embodiments and advantages of the invention are set forth in part in the description, which follows, and in part, may be obvious from this description, or may be learned from the practice of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1. The TPT and the FNR promoters show a comparable expression pattern in green tissue and in flowers of tobacco and potato. (a) A: Potato leaves. B: Tobacco petioles. (b) C: Tobacco stems. D: Tobacco internodia. (c) E: Tobacco flower.

FIG. 2. The TPT promoter and the FNR promoter show a different expression pattern in vegetative and germinative storage tissue of tobacco and potato. (a) A: Tobacco seeds. B: Potato tubers. (b) C: Tobacco seedlings.

FIG. 3. Expression cassettes for the expression of kanamycin-resistance (nptII) and phosphinothricin-resistance (pat) markers.

FIG. 4. Regeneration of transformed tobacco plumulae under kanamycin selection pressure. A: transformation with an FNR promoter-nptII construct. B; transformation with a TPT promoter-nptII construct.

FIG. 5. Germination of transformed tobacco plants from transgenic tobacco seeds under phosphinothricin selection pressure. A: transformed with an FNR promoter-pat construct. B: transformed with a TPT promoter-pat construct. C: control with untransformed tobacco seeds.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to providing regulatory sequences of plants, which fulfill as many of the herein mentioned properties as possible and which mediate especially a ubiquitous and development-independent (constitutive) expression of a nucleic acid sequence to be expressed which preferably codes for a selection marker. Despite various plant promoters for which a constitutive expression at least in individual species is claimed, no promoter having the desired properties listed herein has been described up to now. The invention is further directed to the identification of appropriate promoters.

We found that this is achieved by providing expression cassettes based on the promoters of a putative ferredoxin gene (pFD “putative ferredoxin” herein) from Arabidopsis thaliana, of the ferredoxin NADPH oxidoreductase (FNR herein) gene from Arabidopsis thaliana and of the triose phosphate translocator (TPT) gene from Arabidopsis thaliana:

Promoter of a Putative Ferredoxin (pFD) from Arabidopsis thaliana:

During analysis of the Arabidopsis genome, the ORF of a putative ferredoxin gene was identified. The isolated 836 bp 5′-flanking sequence fused to the Glucuronidase gene surprisingly exhibited a constitutive expression pattern in transgenic tobacco. The sequence corresponds to a sequence section on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4, as it has been deposited at GenBank under Acc. No. Z97337 (Version Z97337.2; base pair 85117 to 85952; the gene starting from bp 85953 is annotated “strong similarity to ferredoxin [2Fe-2S]I, Nostoc muscorum”). (The gene is not to be confused with the A. thaliana gene for preferredoxin annotated under GenBank Acc.—NoAcc. No: X51370; Vorst O et al. (1990) Plant Mol Biol 14(4):491-499).

Only a weak activity was detected in the anthers/pollen of the closed flower buds and no activity whatsoever was detected in mature flowers. Contrary to the reservations, derived from the findings in the literature, toward a suitability of the promoter for effective expression of selection markers (for example, owing to the suspected leaf specificity or function in the photosynthetic electron transport), it was possible to demonstrate a highly efficient selection by combination with, for example, the homolog resistance gene (nptII).

2.) Ferredoxin NADPH Oxidoreductase (FNR) Promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana:

Starting from the information on FNR-encoding cDNA from N. tabacum (GenBank Acc. No.: Y14032) the Arabidopis data base was screened for a homologous gene. Primers were synthesized according to said sequence information. The promoter amplified via PCR from Arabidopsis thaliana genomic DNA (635 bp), of which a leaf-specific expression was expected, exhibited in transgenic tobacco plants a surprisingly ubiquitous and insertion site-independent expression.

The promoter sequence partly corresponds to a sequence section on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 5, as it is deposited at GenBank under Acc. No. AB011474 (Version AB011474.1 from Dec. 27, 2000; base pair 70127 to 69493; the gene starting at by 69492 is annotated with “ferredoxin-NADP+reductase”).

No activity was detected in the pollen. Contrary to the reservations, derived from the findings in the literature, toward a suitability of the promoter for effective expression of selection markers (for example, owing to the suspected leaf specificity or function in the photosynthetic electron transport), it was possible to demonstrate a highly efficient selection by combination with, for example, the phosphinothricin resistance gene (bar/pat).

The nondetectable activity of the FNR promoter in seeds allows a use for the expression of genes whose gene products are desired in other parts of the plant and are unwanted in the seeds. For example, pests can be repelled by expressing appropriate toxins such as, for example, Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. Thus it is possible to achieve in potatoes expression in the plant organs above the ground (and thus, for example, a repulsion of pests such as the potato beetle) without simultaneous expression in the tuber which is used as food or animal feed, and this could increase the suitability and acceptance.

3.) Triose Phosphate Translocator (TPT) Promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana:

A 2038 bp PCR fragment was amplified, starting from Arabidopsis GenBank data of chromosome V, clone MCL19. The promoter sequence partly corresponds to a sequence section on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 5, as it is deposited with GenBank under Ace. No. AB006698 (Version AB006698.1 from Dec. 27, 2000; base pair 53242 to 55281; the gene starting at by 55282 is annotated with “phosphate/triose-phosphate translocator”).

Surprisingly, transgenic tobacco plants exhibited not only a high activity in numerous parts of the plant. No activity was detected in the pollen. Contrary to the reservations, derived from the findings in the literature, toward a suitability of the promoter for effective expression of selection markers (for example, owing to the suspected leaf specificity), it was possible to demonstrate a highly efficient selection by combination with, for example, the phosphinothricin resistance gene (bar/pat).

The ubiquitous expression pattern, but especially also the ability of the TPT promoter regarding the expression of selection markers, comes as a great surprise for the skilled worker, since the triosephosphate translocator is responsible for the exchange of C3 sugar phosphates between the cytosol and the plastids in photosynthetic leaves. The TPT is located in the inner chloroplast membrane. Colorless plastids typically contain a hexose transporter via which C6-sugar phosphates are exchanged. It is not to be expected that such genes are active in the early callus and embryogenesis stages (Stitt (1997) Plant Metabolism, 2nd ed., Dennis eds. Longman Press, Harlow, U K, 382-400).

The pFD, FNR and TPT promoters proved to be sufficiently strong in order to express nucleic acid sequences, in particular selection marker genes, successfully. Furthermore, various deletion variants of the abovementioned promoters, in particular a truncated variant of the pFD promoter (699 bp) and of the TPT promoter (1318 bp), proved suitable for ensuring the expression of, for example, selection markers such as the homolog resistance (nptII).

Furthermore, the Arabidopsis thaliana ubiquitin promoter (Holtorf et al. (1995) Plant Mol Biol 29:637-646) and the squalene synthase promoter (Kribii et al. (1997) Eur J Biochem 249:61-69) were studied within the framework of the studies mentioned, both of which, however, were surprisingly unsuitable for mediating selection marker gene expression although the literature data of the ubiquitin promoters from monocotyledons (see above) had led to the assumption that in particular the ubiquitin promoter of a dicotyledonous plant should have worked as a promoter of a selection marker system (see comparative examples 1 and 3). A similar statement applies to the squalene synthase promoter whose characterization had led to the expectation that it would be possible to achieve sufficiently high rates of expression for the successful control of a selection marker gene (Del Arco and Boronat (1999) 4th European Symposium on Plant Isoprenoids, 21.—Dec. 23, 1999, Barcelona, Spain) (see comparative examples 2 and 3).

The present invention therefore relates firstly to expression cassettes for transgenic expression of nucleic acids, comprising: a) a promoter according to SEQ ID No: 1, 2 or 3, b) a functional equivalent or equivalent fragment of a), which essentially possesses the same promoter activity as a), a) or b) being functionally linked to a nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically.

The invention further relates to methods for transgenic expression of nucleic acids, wherein a nucleic acid sequence which is functionally linked to a) a promoter according to SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3 or b) a functional equivalent or equivalent fragment of a) which essentially possesses the same promoter activities as a), is expressed transgenically.

Expression comprises transcription of the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically but may also include, in the case of an open reading frame in sense orientation, translation of the transcribed RNA of the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically into a corresponding polypeptide.

An expression cassette for transgenic expression of nucleic acids or a method for transgenic expression of nucleic acids comprises all those constructions produced by genetic methods or methods in which either a) a promoter according to SEQ ID No: 1, 2 or 3 or a functional equivalent or equivalent fragment thereof, or b) the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed, or c) (a) and (b) are not present in their natural genetic environment (i.e. at their natural chromosomal locus) or have been modified by genetic methods, and said modification may be, by way of example, a substitution, addition, deletion, inversion or insertion of one or more nucleotide residues.

The expression cassettes of the invention, vectors derived from them or the methods of the invention may comprise functional equivalents of the promoter sequences described under SEQ ID No: 1, 2 or 3. Functionally equivalent sequences also comprise all those sequences which are derived from the complementary counter strand of the sequences defined by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3 and which have essentially the same promoter activity.

Functional equivalents with respect to the promoters of the invention means in particular natural or artificial mutations of the promoter sequences described under SEQ ID No: 1, 2 or 3 and of the homologs thereof from other plant genera and species, which furthermore have essentially the same promoter activity.

A promoter activity is essentially referred to as identical, if the transcription of a particular gene to be expressed under the control of a particular promoter derived from SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3 under otherwise unchanged conditions has a location within the plant, which is at least 50%, preferably at least 70%, particularly preferably at least 90%, very particularly preferably at least 95%, congruent with that of a comparative expression obtained using a promoter described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3. In this connection, the expression level may deviate both downward and upward in comparison to a comparative value. In this connection, preference is given to those sequences whose expression level, measured on the basis of the transcribed mRNA or the subsequently translated protein, differs quantitatively by not more than 50%, preferably 25%, particularly preferably 10%, from a comparative value obtained using a promoter described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3, under otherwise unchanged conditions. Particular preference is given to those sequences whose expression level, measured on the basis of the transcribed mRNA or of the subsequently translated protein, is quantitatively more than 50%, preferably 100%, particularly preferably 500%, very particularly preferably 1000%, higher than a comparative value obtained with the promoter described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3, under otherwise unchanged conditions. The comparative value is preferably the expression level of the natural mRNA of the particular gene or of the natural gene product. A further preferred comparative value is the expression level obtained using a random but particular nucleic acid sequence, preferably those nucleic acid sequences which code for readily quantifiable proteins. In this connection, very particular preference is given to reporter proteins (Schenborn E, Groskreutz D. Mol. Biotechnol. 1999; 13(1):29-44) such as the green fluorescence protein (GFP) (Chui W L et al., Curr Biol 1996, 6:325-330; Leffel S M et al., Biotechniques. 23(5):912-8, 1997), chloramphenicol transferase, a luciferase (Millar et al., Plant Mol Biol Rep 1992 10:324-414) or β-galactosidase, and very particular preference is given to .beta.-glucuronidase (Jefferson et al. (1987) EMBO J. 6:3901-3907).

Otherwise unchanged conditions means the expression initiated by one of the expression cassettes to be compared is not modified by a combination with additional genetic control sequences, for example enhancer sequences. Unchanged conditions further means that all basic conditions such as, for example, plant species, developmental stage of the plants, growing conditions, assay conditions (such as buffer, temperature, substrates, etc.) are kept identical between the expressions to be compared.

Mutations comprise substitutions, additions, deletions, inversions or insertions of one or more nucleotide residues. Thus, for example, the present invention also includes those nucleotide sequences which are obtained by modification of a promoter of SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3. The aim of such a modification may be the further narrowing down of the sequence comprised therein or else, for example, the introduction of further restriction enzyme cleavage sites, the removal of excess DNA or the addition of further sequences, for example of further regulatory sequences.

Where insertions, deletions or substitutions such as, for example, transitions and transversions are suitable, techniques known per se, such as in vitro mutagenesis, “primer repair”, restriction or ligation, may be used. Manipulations such as, for example, restriction, chewing-back or filling-in of protruding ends to give blunt ends can provide complementary fragment ends for ligation. Similar results can be obtained using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific oligonucleotide primers.

Homology between two nucleic acids means the identity of the nucleic acid sequence over the in each case entire length of the sequence, which is calculated by comparison with the aid of the GAP program algorithm (Wisconsin Package Version 10.0, University of Wisconsin, Genetics Computer Group (GCG), Madison, USA), with the parameters set as follows:

Gap Weight: 12 Length Weight: 4 Average Match: 2.912 Average Mismatch: −2.003

By way of example, a sequence which is at least 50% homologous at the nucleic acid level with the sequence SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3 means a sequence which is at least 50% homologous when compared to the sequence SEQ ID NO. 1, 2 or 3 according to the above program algorithm using the above set of parameters.

Functional homologs to the abovementioned promoters for use in the expression cassettes of the invention preferably include those sequences which, are at least 50%, preferably 70%, preferentially at least 80%, particularly preferably at least 90%, very particularly preferably at least 95%, most preferably 99%, homologous over a length of at least 100 base pairs, preferably at least 200 base pairs, particularly preferably at least 300 base pairs, very particularly preferably at least 400 base pairs and most preferably of at least 500 base pairs.

Further examples of the promoter sequences employed in the expression cassettes or vectors of the invention can readily be found, for example, in various organisms whose genomic sequence is known, such as, for example, Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassica napus, Nicotiana tabacum, Solanum tuberosum, Helianthium anuus, Linum sativum by comparing homologies in databases.

Functional equivalents further means DNA sequences which hybridize under standard conditions with the nucleic acid sequence coding for a promoter according to SEQ ID NO:1, 2 or 3 or with the nucleic acid sequences complementary to it and which have essentially the same properties. Standard hybridization conditions has a broad meaning and means both stringent and less stringent hybridization conditions. Such hybridization conditions are described, inter alia, in Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T et al., in Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989, pp. 9.31-9.57) or in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. (1989), 6.3.1-6.3.6.

The conditions during the washing step may be selected by way of example from the range of conditions limited by those of low stringency (with approximately 2.times.SSC at 50° C.) and those with high stringency (with approximately 0.2×SSC at 50° C., preferably at 65° C.) (20×SSC: 0.3 M sodium citrate, 3 M NaCl, pH 7.0). In addition, the temperature may be raised during the washing step from low stringency conditions at room temperature, approximately 22° C., to higher stringency conditions at approximately 65° C. Both parameters, salt concentration and temperature, may be varied simultaneously, and it is also possible to keep one of the two parameters constant and to vary only the other one. Denaturing agents such as, for example, formamide or SDS may also be employed during hybridization. In the presence of 50% formamide, hybridization is preferably carried out at 42° C. Some exemplary conditions for hybridization and washing are listed below:

(1) Hybridization conditions with, for example,

a) 4×SSC at 65° C., or

b) 6×SSC, 0.5% SDS, 10.mu.g/ml denatured, fragmented salmon sperm DNA at 65° C., or

c) 4×SSC, 50% formamide, at 42° C., or

d) 6×SSC, 0.5% SDS, 10.mu.g/ml denatured, fragmented salmon sperm-DNA, 50% formamide at 42° C., or

e) 2× or 4×SSC at 50° C. (low stringency condition), or

f) 2× or 4×SSC, 30 to 40% formamide at 42° C. (low stringency condition).

g) 6×SSC at 45° C., or,

h) 50% formamide, 4×SSC at 42° C., or

i) 50% (vol/vol) formamide, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Ficoll, 0.1% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.5, 75 mM NaCl, 75 mM sodium citrate at 42° C., or

j) 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 2 mM EDTA, 1% BSA and 7% SDS.

(2) Washing steps with, for example:

a) 0.1 C SSC at 65° C., or

b) 0.1×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 68° C., or

c) 0.1×SSC, 0.5% SDS, 50% formamide at 42° C., or

d) 0.2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 42° C., or

e) 2×SSC at 65° C. (low stringency condition), or

f) 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 1% SDS, 2 mM EDTA.

Methods for preparing functional equivalents of the invention preferably comprise introducing mutations into a promoter of SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3. A mutagenesis may be random and the mutagenized sequences are subsequently screened with respect to their properties according to a trial-by-error procedure. Examples of particularly advantageous selection criteria are an increased resistance to a selection marker and the level of the resulting expression of the introduced nucleic acid sequence.

As an alternative, it is possible to delete non-essential sequences of a promoter of the invention without substantially impairing said properties. Such deletion variants are functionally equivalent fragments of the promoters described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3. Examples of such deletion mutants or functionally equivalent fragments, which may be mentioned, are the truncated pFD promoter sequence (pFDs) according to SEQ ID NO: 4 and the truncated TPT promoter sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 27 which, as functionally equivalent parts of their respective source promoters, are expressly included.

The narrowing-down of the promoter sequence to particular essential regulatory regions may also be carried out with the aid of search routines for searching for promoter elements. Particular promoter elements are often present in increased numbers in the regions relevant for promoter activity. Said analysis may be carried out, for example, by computer programs such as the program PLACE (“Plant Cis-acting Regulatory DNA Elements”) (K. Higo et al., (1999) Nucleic Acids Research 27:1, 297-300) or the BIOBASE data bank “Transfac” (Biologische Datenbanken GmbH, Brunswick).

Methods for mutagenizing nucleic acid sequences are known to the skilled worker and include, by way of example, the use of oligonucleotides having one or more mutations in comparison with the region to be mutated (for example, within the framework of a site-specific mutagenesis). Typically, primers with from approximately 15 to approximately 75 nucleotides or more are employed, preferably from approx. 10 to approx. 25 or more nucleotide residues being located on both sites of the sequence to be modified. Details and the procedure of said mutagenesis methods are familiar to the skilled worker (Kunkel et al., Methods Enzymol, 154:367-382, 1987; Tomic et al. (1990) Nucl Acids Res 12:1656; Upender, Raj, Weir (1995) Biotechniques 18(1):29-30; U.S. Pat. No. 4,237,224). A mutagenesis may also be carried out by treating, for example, vectors comprising one of the nucleic acid sequences of the invention with mutagenizing agents such as hydroxylamine.

The nucleic acid sequences which are comprised in the expression cassettes of the invention and which are to be expressed transgenically may be functionally linked to further genetic control sequences, in addition to one of the promoters of the invention.

A functional linkage means, for example, the sequential arrangement of a promoter, of the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically and, where appropriate, of further regulatory elements such as, for example, a terminator in such a way that each of the regulatory elements can carry out its function in the transgenic expression of said nucleic acid sequence, depending on the arrangement of the nucleic acid sequences with respect to sense or antisense RNA. This does not absolutely necessitate a direct linkage in the chemical sense. Genetic control sequences such as, for example, enhancer sequences may exert their function on the target sequence also from relatively distant positions or even from other DNA molecules. Preference is given to arrangements in which the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically is positioned downstream of the sequence functioning as promoter so that both sequences are covalently linked to one another. The distance between the promoter sequence and the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically is preferably less than 200 base pairs, particularly preferably less than 100 base pairs and very particularly preferably less than 50 base pairs.

A functional linkage may be prepared by means of common recombination and cloning techniques, as are described, for example, in T. Maniatis, E. F. Fritsch and J. Sambrook, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1989) and in T. J. Silhavy, M. L. Berman and L. W. Enquist, Experiments with Gene Fusions, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1984) and in Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene Publishing Assoc. and Wiley Interscience (1987). It is also possible to position further sequences between said two sequences, which have, for example, the function of a linker with particular restriction enzyme cleavage sites or of a signal peptide. Likewise, the insertion of sequences may lead to the expression of fusion proteins.

The term “genetic control sequences” has a broad meaning and means all those sequences which influence the generation or function of the expression cassette of the invention. For example, genetic control sequences modify transcription and translation in prokaryotic or eukaryotic organisms. The expression cassettes of the invention preferably comprise 5′-upstream of the particular nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically one of the promoters of the invention and 3′-downstream a terminator sequence as an additional genetic control sequence and also, where appropriate, further common regulatory elements which are in each case functionally linked to the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically.

Genetic control sequences also include further promoters, promoter elements or minimal promoters which may modify the expression-controlling properties. Thus, for example, genetic control sequences can effect tissue-specific expression additionally depending on particular stress factors. Corresponding elements have been described, for example, for water stress, abscisic acid (Lam E and Chua N H (1991) J Biol Chem 266(26): 17131-17135) and heat stress (Schoffl F et al., (1989) Molecular & General Genetics 217(2-3):246-53).

Further promoters which make possible expression in further plant tissues or in other organisms such as, for example, in E. coli bacteria may furthermore be functionally linked to the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed. Suitable plant promoters are in principle all of the above-described promoters. It is conceivable, for example, that a particular nucleic acid sequence is transcribed as sense RNA via one promoter (for example one of the promoters of the invention) in one plant tissue and is translated into the corresponding protein, while the same nucleic acid sequence is transcribed to antisense RNA via another promoter having a different specificity in another tissue and the corresponding protein is down-regulated. This may be carried out via an expression cassette of the invention by positioning the one promoter upstream of the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically and the other promoter downstream of said sequence.

Genetic control sequences furthermore also include the 5′-untranslated region, introns or the noncoding 3′-region of genes, preferably of the pFD, FNR or TPT-genes. It has been demonstrated that these genes may have a substantial function in the regulation of gene expression. Thus it was shown that 5′-untranslated sequences can enhance transient expression of heterologous genes. They may furthermore promote tissue specificity (Rouster J et al. (1998) Plant J. 15:435-440). Conversely, the 5′-untranslated region of the opaque-2 gene suppresses expression. A deletion of the corresponding region leads to an increase in gene activity (Lohmer S et al. (1993) Plant Cell 5:65-73). The nucleic acid sequence indicated under SEQ ID NO:1, 2 or 3 contains the pFD, FNR or TPT-gene section which represents the promoter and the 5′-untranslated region up to the ATG start codon of the respective protein.

McElroy and colleagues (McElroy et al. (1991) Mol Gen Genet 231(1):150-160) reported a construct for transforming monocotyledonous plants, which is based on the rice actin 1 (Act1) promoter. The use of the Act1 intron in combination with the 35S promoter leads in transgenic rice cells to a ten times higher rate of expression compared to the isolated 35S promoter. Optimization of the sequence surrounding the translation initiation site of the reporter gene (GUS) resulted in a four-fold increase of GUS expression in transformed rice cells. A combination of optimized translation initiation site and Act1 intron resulted in a 40-fold increase in GUS expression via the CaMV35S promoter in transformed rice cells; similar results were achieved on the basis of transformed corn cells. Overall, it was concluded from the above-described studies that the expression vectors based on the Act1 promoter are suitable for controlling a sufficiently strong and constitutive expression of foreign DNA in transformed cells of monocotyledonous plants.

The expression cassette may advantageously contain one or more “enhancer sequences” which are functionally linked to the promoter and which enable an increased transgenic expression of the nucleic acid sequence. It is possible to insert additional advantageous sequences such as further regulatory elements or terminators at the 3′-end of the nucleic acid sequences to be expressed transgenically, too. Any of the expression cassettes of the invention may contain one or more copies of the nucleic acid sequences to be expressed transgenically.

Control sequences furthermore means those which enable homologous recombination or insertion into the genome of a host organism or which allow the removal from the genome. In homologous recombination, for example, the natural promoter of a particular gene may be replaced with one of the promoters of the invention. Methods such as the cre/lox technology allow tissue-specific, specifically inducible removal of the expression cassette from the genome of the host organism (Sauer B. (1998) Methods. 14(4):381-92). In this case, particular flanking sequences are attached to the target gene (lox sequences), which later enable a removal by means of the cre recombinase.

The promoter to be introduced may be placed upstream of the target gene to be expressed transgenically by means of homologous recombination by linking the promoter to DNA sequences which are, for example, homologous to endogenous sequences upstream of the reading frame of the target gene. Such sequences are to be understood as genetic control sequences. After a cell has been transformed with the appropriate DNA construct, the two homologous sequences can interact and thus place the promoter sequence at the desired position upstream of the target gene so that said promoter sequence is now functionally linked to the target gene and forms an expression cassette of the invention. The selection of the homologous sequences determines the insertion point of the promoter. In this case, the expression cassette can be generated by homologous recombination by means of a simple or a doubly-reciprocal recombination. In the case of the singly-reciprocal recombination, only a single recombination sequence is used and the entire introduced DNA is inserted. In the case of the doubly-reciprocal recombination, the DNA to be introduced is flanked by two homologous sequences and the flanked region is inserted. The latter method is suitable for replacing, as described above, the natural promoter of a particular gene with one of the promoters of the invention and thus modifying the location and time of expression of this gene. This functional linkage represents an expression cassette of the invention.

The selection of successfully homologously recombined or else transformed cells normally requires the additional introduction of a selectable marker which imparts to the successfully recombined cells a resistance to a biocide (for example a herbicide), a metabolism inhibitor such as 2-desoxyglucose 6-phosphate (WO 98/45456) or to an antibiotic. The selection marker permits selection of the transformed cells from the untransformed cells (McCormick et al., Plant Cell Reports 5 (1986), 81-84).

Homologous recombination is a relatively rare event in higher eukaryotes, especially in plants. Random integrations into the host genome predominate. One possibility of removing the randomly integrated sequences and thus accumulating cell clones having a correct homologous recombination is the use of a sequence-specific recombination system as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,110,736. This system consists of three elements: two pairs of specific recombination sequences and a sequence-specific recombinase. This recombinase catalyzes a recombination merely between the two pairs of specific recombination sequences. One pair of these specific DNA sequences is placed outside the DNA sequence to integrated, i.e. outside the two homologous DNA sequences. In the case of a correct homologous recombination, these sequences are not cotransferred into the genome. In the case of a random integration, they normally insert together with the rest of the construct. Using a specific recombinase and a construct comprising a second pair of said specific sequences, the randomly inserted sequences can be excised or inactivated by inversion, while the sequences inserted correctly via homologous recombination remain in the genome. It is possible to use a multiplicity of sequence-specific recombination systems and the Cre/lox system of bacteriophage P1, the FLP/FRT system of yeast, the Gin recombinase of phase Mu, the E. coli Pin recombinase and the R/RS system of the plasmid pSR1 are mentioned by way of example. Preference is given to the bacteriophage P1 Cre/10.times. and the yeast FLP/FRT system. Here the recombinase (Cre or FLP) interacts specifically with its respective recombination sequences (34 bp lox sequence or 47 bp FRT sequence) in order to delete or invert the transiently stored sequences. The FLP/FRT and cre/lox recombinase systems have already been applied to plant systems (Odell et al. (1990) Mol. Gen. Genet., 223:369-378).

Polyadenylation signals suitable as control sequences are plant polyadenylation signals and, preferably, those which correspond essentially to Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA polyadenylation signals, in particular of the T-DNA gene 3 (octopene synthase) of the Ti plasmid pTiACHS (Gielen et al., (1984) EMBO J. 3:(1984), 835 ff) or functional equivalents thereof.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the expression cassette contains a terminator sequence functional in plants. Terminator sequences functional in plants means in general those sequences which are capable of causing the termination of transcription of a DNA sequence in plants. Examples of suitable terminator sequences are the OCS (octopene synthase) terminator and the NOS (nopaline synthase) terminator. However, particular preference is given to terminator sequences of plants. Terminator sequences of plants means in general those sequences which are part of a natural plant gene. In this connection, particular preference is given to the terminator of the potato cathepsin D inhibitor gene (GenBank Acc. No.: X74985; terminator: SEQ ID NO: 28) or of the terminator of the field bean storage protein gene VfLEIB3 (GenBank Ace. No.: Z26489; terminator: SEQ ID NO: 29). These terminators are at least equivalent to the viral or T-DNA terminators described in the prior art. The plasmid pSUN5NPTIICat (SEQ ID NO: 24) contains the plant terminator of the potato cathepsin D inhibitor gene.

The skilled worker knows a multiplicity of nucleic acids or proteins whose recombinant expression which is controlled by the expression cassettes or methods of the invention is advantageous. The skilled worker further knows a multiplicity of genes whose repression or elimination by means of expression of a corresponding antisense RNA can likewise achieve advantageous effects. Advantageous effects which may be mentioned by way of example and not by way of limitation are:

-   -   easier preparation of a transgenic organism, for example by         expression of selection markers:     -   achieving a resistance to abiotic stress factors (heat, cold,         drought, increased humidity, environmental toxins, UV         radiation);     -   achieving a resistance to biotic stress factors (pathogens,         viruses, insects and diseases);     -   improvement of the properties of food- or feedstuffs;     -   improvement of growth rate or yield.

Some specific examples of nucleic acids whose expression provides the desired advantageous effects are mentioned below:

1. Selection Markers.

Selection markers includes both positive selection markers which impart a resistance to an antibiotic, herbicide or biocide and negative selection markers which impart a sensitivity to exactly these substances and also markers which give a growth advantage to the transformed organism (for example by expressing key genes of cytokine biosynthesis; Ebinuma H et al. (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2117-2121). In the case of positive selection, only those organisms which express the appropriate selection marker grow, while the same organisms die in the case of negative selection. The preparation of transgenic plants prefers the use of a positive selection marker. Furthermore, preference is given to using selection markers which impart growth advantages. Negative selection markers may be used advantageously if particular genes or genome sections are to be removed from an organism (for example in a crossing process).

The selectable marker introduced with the expression cassette imparts to the successfully recombined or transformed cells a resistance to a biocide (for example a herbicide such as phosphinothricin, glyphosate or bromoxynil), a metabolism inhibitor such as 2-desoxyglucose 6-phosphate (WO 98/45456) or to an antibiotic such as, for example, kanamycin, G 418, bleomycin, hygromycin. The selection marker permits selection of the transformed cells from the untransformed cells (McCormick et al., Plant Cell Reports 5 (1986), 81-84). Particularly preferred selection markers are those which impart a resistance to herbicides. A large number of such selection markers and the sequences coding therefor are known to the skilled worker. Examples which may be mentioned by way of example but not by way of limitation are the following:

i) Positive Selection Markers.

The selectable marker introduced with the expression cassette imparts to the successfully recombined or transformed cells a resistance to a biocide (for example a herbicide such as phosphinothricin, glyphosate or bromoxynil), a metabolism inhibitor such as 2-desoxyglucose 6-phosphate (WO 98/45456) or to an antibiotic such as, for example, tetracyclines, ampicillin, kanamycin, G418, neomycin, bleomycin or hygromycin. The selection marker permits selection of the transformed cells from the untransformed cells (McCormick et al., Plant Cell Reports 5 (1986), 81-84). Particularly preferred selection markers are those which impart a resistance to herbicides. Examples of selection markers which may be mentioned are:

-   -   DNA sequences coding for phosphinothricin acetyltransferases         (PAT) which acetylate the free amino group of the glutamine         synthase inhibitor phosphinothricin (PPT) and thus detoxify PPT         (de Block et al. 1987, EMBO J. 6, 2513-2518) (also referred to         as Bialaphos®-Resistance gene (bar)). The bar gene coding for a         phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) may be isolated, for         example, from Streptomyces hygroscopicus or S.         viridochromogenes. Corresponding sequences are known to the         skilled worker (from Streptomyces hygroscopicus GenBank Acc.         No.: X17220 and X05822, from Streptomyces viridochromogenes         GenBank Acc. No.: M 22827 and X65195; U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,520).         Furthermore, synthetic genes, for example for expression in         plastids, have been described AJ028212. A synthetic Pat gene is         described in Becker et al. (1994), The Plant J. 5:299-307. Very         particular preference is likewise given to the expression of the         polypeptide according to SEQ ID NO: 5, for example encoded by a         nucleic acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 4. The genes         impart a resistance to the herbicide Bialaphos® or glufosinate         and are frequently used markers in transgenic plants (Vickers, J         E et al. (1996). Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 14:363-368; Thompson         C J et al. (1987) EMBO Journal 6:2519-2523).     -   5-Enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase genes (EPSP         synthasegenes) which impart a resistance to Glyphosat®         (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycin). The molecular target of the         unselective herbicide glyphosate is         5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthase (EPSPS). This enzyme         has a key function in the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids         in microbes and plants but not in mammals (Steinrucken H C et         al. (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 94:1207-1212; Levin J         G and Sprinson D B (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239: 1142-1150; Cole D         J (1985) Mode of action of glyphosate; A literature analysis, p.         48-74. In: Grossbard E and Atkinson D (eds.). The herbicide         glyphosate. Buttersworths, Boston). Preference is given to using         glyphosate-tolerant EPSPS variants as selection markers         (Padgette S R et al. (1996). New weed control opportunities:         development of soybeans with a Roundup Ready™ gene. In:         Herbicide Resistant Crops (Duke, S. O., ed.), pp. 53-84. CRC         Press, Boca Raton, Fla.; Saroha M K and Malik V S (1998) J Plant         Biochemistry and Biotechnology 7:65-72). The EPSPS gene of         Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4 has a natural tolerance for         glyphosate, which can be transferred to appropriate transgenic         plants. The CP4 EPSPS gene was cloned from Agrobacterium sp.         strain CP4 (Padgette S R et al. (1995) Crop Science         35(5):1451-1461). 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthases,         which are glyphosate-tolerant, as described, for example, in         U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,471; U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,760; U.S. Pat. No.         5,864,425; U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,435; U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061;         U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,175; EP 0 218 571, are preferred and the         sequences described in each case in the patents have also been         deposited with GenBank. Further sequences are described under         GenBank Accession X63374. The aroA gene is also preferred         (M10947 S. typhimurium aroA locus         5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (aroA protein)         gene).     -   the gox (glyphosate oxidoreductase) gene coding for the         Glyphosat®-degrading enzyme. GOX (for example Achromobacter sp.         glyphosate oxidoreductase) catalyzes the cleavage of a C—N bond         in glyphosate which is thus converted to aminomethylphosphonic         acid (AMPA) and glyoxylate. GOX can thereby mediate a resistance         to glyphosate (Padgette S R et al. (1996) J. Nutr. 1996 March;         126(3):702-16; Shah D et al. (1986) Science 233: 478-481).     -   the deh gene (coding for a dehalogenase which inactivates         Dalaponr), (GenBank Acc. No.: AX022822, AX022820 and         WO99/27116).     -   bxn genes which code for Bromoxynil®-degrading nitrilase enzyme.         For example the Klebsiella ozanenae nitrilase. Sequences can be         found at GenBank, for example under Acc. No: EO 1313 (DNA         encoding bromoxynil-specific nitrilase) and J03196 (K.         pneumoniae bromoxynil-specific nitrilase (bxn) gene, complete         cds).     -   Neomycin phosphotransferases impart a resistance to antibiotics         (aminoglycosides) such as neomycin, G418, hygromycin,         paromomycin or kanamycin by reducing the inhibiting action         thereof by a phosphorylation reaction. Particular preference is         given to the nptII gene. Sequences can be obtained from GenBank         (AF080390 minitransposon mTn5-GNm; AF080389 minitransposon         mTn5-Nm, complete sequence). Moreover, the gene is already part         of numerous expression vectors and can be isolated therefrom by         using methods familiar to the skilled worker (such as, for         example, polymerase chain reaction) (AF234316 pCAMBIA-2301;         AF234315 pCAMBIA-2300, AF234314 pCAMBIA-2201). The NPTII gene         codes for an aminoglycoside 3′-O-phosphotransferase from E.         coli, Tn5 (GenBank Acc. No: U00004 position 1401-2300; Beck et         al. (1982) Gene 19 327-336).     -   the DOG®1-gene. The DOG®1 gene was isolated from the yeast         Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EP 0 807 836). It codes for a         2-desoxyglucose 6-phosphate phosphatase which imparts resistance         to 2-DOG (Randez-Gil et al. 1995, Yeast 11, 1233-1240; Sanz et         al. (1994) Yeast 10:1195-1202, Sequence: GenBank Ace. No.:         NC001140 chromosome VIII, Saccharomyces cervisiae position         194799-194056).     -   Sulfonylurea- and imidazolinone-inactivating acetolactate         synthases which impart a resistance to         imidazolinone/sulfonylurea herbicides. Examples of imidazolinone         herbicides which may be mentioned are the active substances         imazamethabenz-methyl, imazamox, imazapyr, imazaquin,         imazethapyr. Examples of sulfonylurea herbicides which may be         mentioned are amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, chlorimuronethyl,         chlorsulfuron, cinosulfuron, imazosulfuron, oxasulfuron,         prosulfuron, rimsulfuron, sulfosulfuron. Numerous further active         substances of said classes are known to the skilled worker. An         example of a suitable sequence is the sequence of Arabidopsis         thaliana Csr 1.2 gene deposited under the GenBank Acc-No.:         X51514 (EC 4.1.3.18) (Sathasivan K et al. (1990) Nucleic Acids         Res. 18(8):2188). Acetolactate synthases which impart a         resistance to imidazolinon herbicides are furthermore described         under GenBank Ace. Nos.:

a) AB049823 Oryza sativa ALS mRNA for acetolactate synthase, complete cds, herbicide resistant biotype;

b) AF094326 Bassia scoparia herbicide resistant acetolactate synthase precursor (ALS) gene, complete cds;

c) X07645 Tobacco acetolactate synthase gene, ALS SuRB (EC 4.1.3.18);

d) X07644 Tobacco acetolactate synthase gene, ALS SuRA (EC 4.1.3.18);

e) A19547 Synthetic nucleotide mutant acetolactate synthase;

f) A19546 Synthetic nucleotide mutant acetolactate synthase;

g) A19545 Synthetic nucleotide mutant acetolactate synthase;

h) 105376 Sequence 5 from Patent EP 0257993;

i) Sequence 2 from Patent EP 0257993;

j) AL133315.

Preference is given to expressing an acetolactate synthase according to SEQ ID NO: 7, for example encoded by a nucleic acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 6.

-   -   Hygromycin phosphotransferases (X74325 P. pseudomallei gene for         hygromycin phosphotransferase) which impart a resistance to the         antibiotic hygromycin. The gene is part of numerous expression         vectors and can be isolated therefrom by using methods familiar         to the skilled worker (such as, for example, polymerase chain         reaction) (AF294981 pINDEX4; AF234301 pCAMBIA-1380; AF234300         pCAMBIA-1304; AF234299 pCAMBIA-1303; AF234298 pCAMBIA-1302;         AF354046 pCAMBIA-1305; AF354045 pCAMBIA-1305.1).     -   Genes for resistance to:

a) chloramphenicol (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase);

tetracycline, various resistance genes have been described, for example X65876 S. ordonez genes class D tetA and tetR for tetracycline resistance and repressor proteins X51366 Bacillus cereus plasmid pBC16 tetracycline resistance gene. The gene is also already part of numerous expression vectors and can be isolated therefrom by using methods familiar to the skilled worker (such as, for example, polymerase chain reaction);

c) streptomycin, various resistance genes have been described, for example under GenBank Acc. No.: AJ278607 Corynebacterium acetoacidophilum ant gene for streptomycin adenylyltransferase;

d) zeocin, the corresponding resistance gene is part of numerous cloning vectors (e.g. L36849 cloning vector pZEO) and can be isolated therefrom by using methods familiar to the skilled worker (such as, for example, polymerase chain reaction);

e) ampicillin (β-lactamase gene; Datta N, Richmond M H. (1966) Biochem J. 98(1):204-9; Heffron F et al (1975) J. Bacteriol 122: 250-256; the amp gene was initially cloned for preparing the E. coli vectors pBR322; Bolivar F et al. (1977) Gene 2:95-114). The sequence is part of numerous cloning vectors and can be isolated therefrom by using methods familiar to the skilled worker (such as, for example, polymerase chain reaction).

-   -   Genes such as the isopentenyl transferase from Agrobacterium         tumefaciens (strain:PO22) (GenBank Acc. No.: AB025109). The ipt         gene is [lacuna] a key enzyme of cytokine biosynthesis. Its         overexpression facilitates the regeneration of plants (e.g.         selection of cytokine-free medium). The method for using the ipt         gene has been described (Ebinuma H et al. (2000) Proc Natl Acad         Sci USA 94:2117-2121; Ebinuma, H et al. (2000) Selection of         Marker-free transgenic plants using the oncogenes (ipt, rol A,         B, C) of Agrobacterium as selectable markers, In Molecular         Biology of Woody Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers).

Various other positive selection markers which impart to the transformed plants a growth advantage over untransformed plants and methods of their use are described, inter alia, in EP-A 0 601 092. Examples which may be mentioned are β-glucuronidase (in connection with, for example, cytokinine glucuronide), mannose 6-phosphate isomerase (in connection with mannose), UDP-galactose 4-epimerase (in connection with, for example, galactose), mannose 6-phosphate isomerase in connection with mannose being particularly preferred.

ii) Negative Selection Markers.

Negative selection markers make possible, for example, the selection of organisms in which sequences comprising the marker gene have been successfully deleted (Koprek T et al. (1999) The Plant Journal 19(6):719-726). In negative selection, for example, a compound which otherwise has no disadvantageous effect on the plant is converted to a compound having a disadvantageous effect, due to the negative selection marker introduced into the plant. Genes which have a disadvantageous effect per se, such as, for example, TK thymidine kinase (TK), and diphtheria toxin A fragment (DT-A), the codA gene product coding for a cytosine deaminase (Gleave A P et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 40(2):223-35; Perera R J et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 23(4): 793-799; Stougaard J; (1993) Plant J 3:755-761), the cytochrom P450 gene (Koprek et al. (1999) Plant J. 16:719-726), genes coding for a haloalkane dehalogenase (Naested H (1999) Plant J. 18:571-576), the iaaH gene (Sundaresan V et al. (1995) Genes & Development 9:1797-1810) and the tms2 gene (Fedoroff N V & Smith D L 1993, Plant J 3: 273-289) are also suitable.

The concentrations of the antibiotics, herbicides, biocides or toxins, used in each case for selection, have to be adapted to the particular assay conditions or organisms. Examples which may be mentioned for plants are kanamycin (Km) 50 mg/l, hygromycin B 40 mg/l, phosphinothricin (Ppt) 6 mg/l.

It is furthermore possible to express functional analogs of said nucleic acids coding for selection markers. Functional analogs here means all those sequences which have essentially the same function, i.e. which are capable of selection of transformed organisms. In this connection, the functional analog may quite possibly differ in other features. It may have, for example, a higher or lower activity or else further functionalities.

2. Improved protection of the plant against abiotic stress factors such as drought, heat or cold, for example by overexpression of antifreeze-polypeptides from Myoxocephalus Scorpius (WO 00/00512), Myoxocephalus octodecemspinosus, of Arabidopsis thaliana transcription activator CBF1, of glutamate dehydrogenases (WO 97/12983, WO 98/11240), calcium-dependent protein kinase genes (WO 98/26045), calcineurins (WO 99/05902), farnesyl transferases (WO 99/06580, Pei Z M et al., Science 1998, 282: 287-290), ferritin (Deak M et al., Nature Biotechnology 1999, 17:192-196), oxalate oxidase (WO 99/04013; Dunwell J M Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 1998, 15:1-32), DREB1A-Factor (dehydration response element B 1A; Kasuga M et al., Nature Biotechnology 1999, 17:276-286), of genes of mannitol or trehalose synthesis, such as trehalose phosphate synthase or trehalose phosphate phosphatase (WO 97/42326), or by inhibition of genes such as trehalose (WO 98/50561). Particular preference is given to nucleic acids which code for the Arabidopsis thaliana transcription activator CBF1 (GenBank Acc. No.: U77378) or for the Myoxocephalus octodecemspinosus antifreeze protein (GenBank Acc. No.: AF306348) or functional equivalents of the same.

3. Expression of metabolic enzymes for use in the feed and food sectors, for example expression of phytase and cellulases. Particular preference is given to nucleic acids such as the artificial cDNA coding for a microbial phytase (GenBank Acc. No.: A119451) or functional equivalents thereof.

4. Achieving a resistance, for example to fungi, insects, nematodes and diseases, by specific isolation or accumulation of particular metabolites or proteins in the embryonic epidermis. Examples which may be mentioned are glucosinolates (repulsion of herbivores), chitinases or glucanases and other enzymes which destroy the cell wall of parasites, ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) and other proteins of resistance and stress reactions of the plant, such as those induced by injury or microbial infection of plants or chemically by, for example, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid or ethylene, lysozymes from sources other than plants, such as, for example, T4 lysozyme or lysozyme from various mammals, insecticidal proteins such as Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin, α-amylase inhibitor or protease inhibitors (cowpea trypsine inhibitor), glucanases, lectins such as phytohemagglutinin, snowdrop lectin, wheat germ agglutinine, RNases and ribozymes. Particular preference is given to nucleic acids coding for chit42 endochitinase from Trichoderma harzianum (GenBank Acc. No.: S78423) or for the N-hydroxylating, multifunctional cytochrome P-450 (CYP79) protein from Sorghum bicolor (GenBank Am. No.: U32624) or functional equivalents thereof.

What is known is the accumulation of glucosinolates in plants of the genus of Cardales, in particular of oilseeds, for protection against pests (Rask L et al. (2000) Plant Mol Biol 42:93-113; Menard R et al. (1999) Phytochemistry 52:29-35), the expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin under the control of the 35 S CaMV promoter (Vaeck et al. (1987) Nature 328:33-37) or the protection of tobacco against fungal infection by expression of a bean chitinase under the control of the CaMV promoter (Broglie et al. (1991) Science 254:1194-1197).

The expression of the snowdrop (Galanthus nivalis) lectin agglutinine can achieve a resistance to pests such as the rice pest Nilaparvata lugens, for example in transgenic rice plants (Rao et al. (1998) Plant J. 15(4):469-77.). Nilaparvata lugens belongs to the phloem-sucking pests and, in addition, acts as a transmitter of important virus-based plant diseases.

The expression of synthetic cryIA(b) and cryIA(c) genes which code for lepidoptera-specific delta-entotoxins from Bacillus thuringiensis, can cause a resistance to insect pests in various plants. Thus it is possible to achieve a resistance in rice to two of the most important rice insect pests, the striped stem borer (Chilo suppressalis) and the yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas), (Cheng X et al. (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(6):2767-2772; Nayak P et al. (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(6):2111-2116).

5. Expression of genes which cause accumulation of fine chemicals such as tocopherols, tocotrienols or carotenoids. Phytoene desaturase may be mentioned as an example. Preference is given to nucleic acids which code for Narcissus pseudonarcissus phytoene desaturase (GenBank Acc. No.: X78815) or functional equivalents thereof.

6. Production of nutraceuticals such as, for example, polyunsaturated fatty acids such as, for example, arachidonic acid or EP (eicosapentenoic acid) or DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) by expressing fatty-acid elongases and/or desaturases or by producing proteins having an improved nutritional value such as, for example, a high proportion of essential amino acids (e.g. the methionine-rich brazil nut albumingen). Preference is given to nucleic acids coding for the methionine-rich Bertholletia excelsa 2S albumin (GenBank Acc. No.: AB044391), the Physcomitrella patens Δ6-acyllipid desaturase (GenBank Acc. No.: AJ222980; Girke et al 1998, The Plant Journal 15:39-48), the Mortierella alpina Δ6-desaturase (Sakuradani et al 1999 Gene 238:445-453), the Caenorhabditis elegans Δ5-desaturase (Michaelson et al. 1998, FEBS Letters 439:215-218), the Caenorhabditis elegans Δ5-fatty-acid desaturase (des-5) (GenBank Acc. No.: AF078796), the Mortierella alpina Δ5-desaturase (Michaelson et al. JBC 273:19055-19059), the Caenorhabditis elegans Δ6-elongase (Beaudoin et al. 2000, PNAS 97:6421-6426), the Physcomitrella patens Δ6-elongase (Zank et al. 2000, Biochemical Society Transactions 28:654-657) or functional equivalents thereof.

7. Production of fine chemicals (such as, for example, enzymes) and pharmaceuticals (such as, for example, antibodies or vaccines, as described in Hood E E, Jilka J M. (1999) Curr Opin Biotechnol. 10(4):382-6; Ma J K, Vine N D (1999) Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 236:275-92). For example, it was possible to produce on a large scale recombinant avidin from egg white and bacterial .beta.-glucuronidase (GUS) in transgenic corn plants (Hood et al. (1999) Adv Exp Med Biol 464:127-47. Review). These recombinant proteins from corn plants are sold by Sigma (Sigma Chemicals Co.) as high-purity biochemicals.

8. Achieving an increased storage capability in cells which usually contain relatively few storage proteins or storage lipids, with the aim of increasing the yield of said substances, for example by expressing an acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Preference is given to nucleic acids coding for Medicago sativa acetyl-CoA carboxylase (accase) (GenBank Acc. No.: L25042) or functional equivalents thereof

Further examples of advantageous genes are mentioned, for example, in Dunwell J M, Transgenic approaches to crop improvement, J Exp Bot. 2000; 51 Spec No; pages 487-96. It is furthermore possible to express functional analogs of the nucleic acids and proteins mentioned. Functional analogs here means all those sequences which have essentially the same function, i.e. which are capable of the same function (for example substrate conversion or signal transduction) as the protein mentioned by way of example. The functional analog may quite possibly differ in other features. It may have, for example, a higher or lower activity or else have further functionalities. Functional analogs further means sequences which code for fusion proteins comprising one of the preferred proteins and other proteins, for example another preferred protein, or else a signal peptide sequence.

The nucleic acids may be expressed under the control of the promoters of the invention in any desired cell compartment such as, for example, the endomembrane system, the vacuole and the chloroplasts. Desired glycosylation reactions, particular foldings, and the like are possible by utilizing the secretory pathway. Secretion of the target protein to the cell surface or secretion into the culture medium, for example when using suspension-cultured cells or protoplasts, is also possible. The required target sequences may both be taken into account in individual vector variations and be introduced into the vector together with the target gene to be cloned by using a suitable cloning strategy. Target sequences which may be used are both endogenous, if present, and heterologous sequences. Additional heterologous sequences which are preferred for functional linkage but not limited thereto are further targeting sequences for ensuring subcellular localization in the apoplast, in the vacuole, in plastids, in mitochondria, in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), in the nucleus, in elaioplasts or other compartments; and also translation enhancers such as the 5′-leader sequence from tobacco mosaic virus (Gallie et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 15 (1987), 8693-8711) and the like. The method of transporting proteins which are per se not located in the plastids specifically into said plastids has been described, (Klosgen R B and Weil J H (1991) Mol Gen Genet. 225(2):297-304; Van Breusegem F et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38(3):491-496).

Preferred Sequences are:

a) small subunit (SSU) of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco ssu) from pea, corn, sunflower;

b) transit peptides derived from genes of fatty-acid biosynthesis in plants, such as the transit peptide of the plastid acyl carrier protein (ACP), stearyl-ACP desaturase, β-ketoacyl-ACP synthase or acyl-ACP thioesterase;

c) the transit peptide for GBSSI (“granule bound starch synthase I”); and

d) LHCP II genes.

The target sequences may be linked to other targeting sequences which differ from the transit peptide-encoding sequences, in order to ensure subcellular localization in the apoplast, in the vacuole, in plastids, in the mitochondrion, in the endoplastic reticulum (ER), in the nucleus, in elaioplasts or in other compartments. It is also possible to use translation enhancers such as the 5′-leader sequence from tobacco mosaic virus (Gallie et al. (1987), Nucl. Acids Res. 15: 8693-8711) and the like.

The skilled worker further knows that there is no need for him to express the above-described genes directly by using the nucleic acid sequences coding for said genes or to repress them by antisense, for example. He may also use, for example, artificial transcription factors of the zinc finger protein type (Beerli R R et al. (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(4):1495-500). These factors attach to the regulatory regions of the endogenous genes to be expressed or repressed and cause expression or repression of the endogenous gene, depending on the design of the factor. Thus it is also possible to achieve the desired effects by expressing an appropriate zinc finger transcription factor under the control of one of the promoters of the invention.

It is likewise possible to use the expression cassettes of the invention for suppressing or reducing the replication or/and translation of target genes by gene silencing.

The expression cassettes of the invention may also be employed for expressing nucleic acids which mediate “antisense” effects and thus are capable of reducing the expression of a target protein, for example.

Preferred genes and proteins whose suppression results in an advantageous phenotype include by way of example but not by way of limitation:

a) polygalacturonase for preventing cell degradation and preventing plants and fruits, for example tomatoes, from becoming “mushy”. Preference is given to using for this nucleic acid sequences such as that of the tomato polygalacturonase gene (GenBank Acc. No.: X14074) or its homologs from other genera and species.

reducing the expression of allergenic proteins, as described, for example, in Tada Y et al. (1996) FEBS Lett 391(3):341-345 or Nakamura R (1996) Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 60(8):1215-1221.

c) modifying the color of flowers by suppressing the expression of enzymes of anthocyane biosynthesis. Appropriate procedures have been described (for example in Forkmann G, Martens S. (2001) Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(2):155-160). Preference is given to using for this nucleic acid sequences such as those of flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase (GenBank Acc. No.: AB045593), dihydroflavanol 4-reductase (GenBank Acc. No.: AF017451), chalcone isomerase (GenBank Acc. No.: AF276302), chalcone synthase (GenBank Acc. No.: AB061022), flavanone 3-beta-hydroxylase (GenBank Acc. No.: X72592) and flavone synthase II (GenBank Acc. No.: AB045592) and the homologs thereof from other genera and species.

d) altering the amylose/amylopectin content in starch by suppressing the branching enzyme Q which is responsible for the α-1,6-glycosidic linkage. Appropriate procedures have been described (for example in Schwall G P et al. (2000) Nat Biotechnol 18(5):551-554). Preference is given to using for this nucleic acid sequences such as that of the potato starch branching enzyme II (GenBank Ace. No.: AR123356; U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,226) or its homologs from other genera and species.

An antisense nucleic acid first means a nucleic acid sequence which is completely or partially complementary to at least a part of the sense strand of said target protein. The skilled worker knows that it is possible to use, as an alternative, the cDNA or the corresponding gene as starting template for corresponding antisense constructs. Preferably, the antisense nucleic acid is complementary to the coding region of the target protein or to a part thereof. However, the antisense nucleic acid may also be complementary to the noncoding region or to a part thereof. Starting from the sequence information for a target protein, it is possible to design an antisense nucleic acid in the manner familiar to the skilled worker by taking into account the Watson and Crick base pairing rules. An antisense nucleic acid may be complementary to the entire or to a part of the nucleic acid sequence of a target protein. In a preferred embodiment, the antisense nucleic acid is an oligonucleotide of, for example, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 or 50 nucleotides in length.

In a preferred embodiment, the antisense nucleic acid comprises α-anomeric nucleic acid molecules. α-anomeric nucleic acid molecules form particular double-stranded hybrids with complementary RNA, in which, in contrast to the normal β-units, the strands run parallel to one another (Gautier et al. (1987) Nucleic Acids. Res. 15:6625-6641).

Likewise included is the use of the above-described sequences in sense orientation, which may lead to cosuppression, as is familiar to the skilled worker. It has been demonstrated in tobacco, tomato and petunia that expression of sense RNA of an endogenous gene can reduce or eliminate expression of said gene, in a similar manner to what has been described for antisense approaches (Goring et al. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci USA, 88:1770-1774; Smith et al. (1990) Mol Gen Genet. 224:447-481; Napoli et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:279-289; Van der Krol et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:291-299). The introduced construct may represent the gene to be reduced completely or only partially. The possibility of translation is not required.

Very particular preference is also given to the use of methods such as gene regulation by means of double-stranded RNA (double-stranded RNA interference). Relevant methods are known to the skilled worker and have been described in detail (e.g. Matzke M A et al. (2000) Plant Mol Biol 43:401-415; Fire A. et al (1998) Nature 391:806-811; WO 99/32619; WO 99/53050; WO 00/68374; WO 00/44914; WO 00/44895; WO 00/49035; WO 00/63364). The processes and methods described in the references listed are hereby expressly incorporated by reference. The simultaneous introduction of strand and complementary strand causes here a highly efficient suppression of native genes.

Advantageously, the antisense strategy may be coupled with a ribozyme method. Ribozymes are catalytically active RNA sequences which, coupled to the antisense sequences, catalytically cleave the target sequences (Tanner N K. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1999; 23 (3):257-75). This can increase the efficiency of an antisense strategy. The expression of ribozymes in order to reduce particular proteins is known to the skilled worker and is described, for example, in EP-A1 0 291 533, EP-A1 0 321 201 and EP-A1 0 360 257. Suitable target sequences and ribozymes may be determined, for example, as described in Steinecke (Ribozymes, Methods in Cell Biology 50, Galbraith et al eds Academic Press, Inc. (1995), 449-460), by calculations of the secondary structure of ribozyme RNA and target RNA and by the interaction thereof (Bayley C C et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 1992; 18(2):353-361; Lloyd A M and Davis R W et al., Mol Gen Genet. 1994 March; 242(6):653-657). An example which may be mentioned is hammerhead ribozymes (Haselhoff and Gerlach (1988) Nature 334:585-591). Preferred ribozymes are based on derivatives of Tetrahymena L-19 IVS RNA (U.S. Pat. No. 4,987,071; U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,742). Further ribozymes with selectivity for an L119 mRNA may be selected (Bartel D and Szostak J W (1993) Science 261:1411-1418).

In another embodiment, target protein expression may be reduced using nucleic acid sequences which are complementary to regulatory elements of the target protein genes and which form together with said genes a triple-helical structure and thus prevent gene transcription (Helene C (1991) Anticancer Drug Des. 6(6):569-84; Helene C et al. (1992) Ann NY Acad Sci 660:27-36; Maher L J (1992) Bioassays 14(12):807-815).

The expression cassette of the invention and the vectors derived therefrom may contain further functional elements.

The term functional element has a broad meaning and means all those elements which influence preparation, propagation or function of the expression cassettes of the invention or of vectors or organisms derived therefrom. Examples which may be mentioned but which are not limiting are:

reporter genes which code for readily quantifiable proteins and which ensure, via intrinsic color or enzyme activity, an evaluation of the transformation efficiency and of the location or time of expression. In this connection, very particular preference is given to genes coding for reporter proteins (see also Schenborn E, Groskreutz D. Mol. Biotechnol. 1999; 13(1):29-44) such as:

green fluorescence protein (GFP) (Chui W L et al., Curr Biol 1996, 6:325-330; Leffel S M et al., Biotechniques. 23(5):912-8, 1997; Sheen et al. (1995) Plant Journal 8(5):777-784; Haseloff et al. (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(6):2122-2127; Reichel et al. (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(12):5888-5893; Tian et al. (1997) Plant Cell Rep 16:267-271; WO 97/41228);

chloramphenicol transferase (Fromm et al. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5824-5828);

Luciferase (Millar et al., Plant Mol Biol Rep 1992 10:324-414; Ow et al. (1986) Science, 234:856-859); allows bioluminescence detection;

β-galactosidase, coding for an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are available;

β-glucuronidase (GUS) (Jefferson et al., EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3901-3907) or the uidA gene which encodes an enzyme for various chromogenic substrates;

R-locus gene product: protein which regulates production of anthocyanine pigments (red color) in plant tissue and thus makes possible a direct analysis of the promoter activity without the addition of additional auxiliary substances or chromogenic substrates (Dellaporta et al., In: Chromosome Structure and Function: Impact of New Concepts, 18th Stadler Genetics Symposium, 11:263-282, 1988);

β-lactamase (Sutcliffe (1978) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:3737-3741), enzyme for various chromogenic substrates (e.g. PADAC, a chromogenic cephalosporin);

xylE gene product (Zukowsky et al. (1983) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:1101-1105), catechol dioxygenase which can convert chromogenic catechols;

alpha-amylase (Ikuta et al. (1990) Bio/technol. 8:241-242);

tyrosinase (Katz et al. (1983) J Gen Microbiol 129:2703-2714), enzyme which oxidizes tyrosine to give DOPA and dopaquinone which consequently form the readily detectable melanine;

aequorin (Prasher et al. (1985) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 126(3):1259-1268), may be used in calcium-sensitive bioluminescence detection.

replication origins which ensure a propagation of the expression cassettes or vectors of the invention, for example in E. coli. Examples which may be mentioned are ORI (origin of DNA replication), the pBR322 ori or the P15A ori (Sambrook et al.: Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, 2^(nd) ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989).

elements, for example border sequences, which enable agrobacteria-mediated transfer into plant cells for transfer and integration into the plant genome, such as, for example, the right or left border of T-DNA or the vir region.

multiple cloning regions (MCS) allow and facilitate the insertion of one or more nucleic acid sequences.

Various ways to achieve an expression cassette of the invention are known to the skilled worker. An expression cassette of the invention is prepared, for example, by fusing one of the promoters of the invention (or a functional equivalent or functionally equivalent part according to SEQ ID NO: 1, 2 or 3) or a functional equivalent to a nucleotide sequence to be expressed, where appropriate to a sequence coding for a transit peptide, preferably a chloroplast-specific transit peptide, which is preferably located between the promoter and the particular nucleotide sequence, and also with a terminator or polyadenylation signal. For this purpose, common recombination and cloning techniques as described, for example, in T. Maniatis, E. F. Fritsch and J. Sambrook, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1989) and in T. J. Silhavy, M. L. Berman and L. W. Enquist, Experiments with Gene Fusions, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1984) and in Ausubel, F. M. et al., (1987) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene Publishing Assoc. and Wiley Interscience are used.

However, an expression cassette means also those constructs in which the promoter without having been functionally linked beforehand to a nucleic acid sequence to be expressed, is introduced into a host genome, for example, via specific homologous recombination or random insertion and takes over there regulatory control over nucleic acid sequences then functionally linked to it and controls transgenic expression of said nucleic acid sequences. Insertion of the promoter, for example by homologous recombination, upstream of a nucleic acid coding for a particular polypeptide results in an expression cassette of the invention, which controls expression of the particular polypeptide in the plant. Furthermore, the promoter may also be inserted such that antisense RNA of the nucleic acid coding for a particular polypeptide is expressed. As a result, the expression of said particular polypeptide in plants is down-regulated or eliminated.

Analogously, it is also possible to place a nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically downstream of the endogenous natural promoter, for example by homologous recombination, resulting in an expression cassette of the invention, which controls expression of the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically in the cotyledons of the plant embryo.

The invention further relates to vectors which contain the above-described expression cassettes. Vectors may be, by way of example, plasmids, cosmids, phages, viruses or else agrobacteria.

The invention also relates to transgenic organisms transformed with at least one expression cassette of the invention or one vector of the invention and also to cells, cell cultures, tissue, parts, such as, for example in the case of plant organisms, leaves, roots, etc., or propagation material derived from such organisms.

Organisms, starting or host organisms mean prokaryotic or eukaryotic organisms such as, for example, microorganisms or plant organisms. Preferred microorganisms are bacteria, yeasts, algae or fungi. Preferred bacteria are bacteria of the genus Escherichia, Erwinia, Agrobacterium, Flavobacterium, Alcaligenes or cyanobacteria for example of the genus Synechocystis. Preference is given especially to microorganisms which are capable of infecting plants and thus transferring the cassettes of the invention. Preferred microorganisms are those of the genus Agrobacterium and, in particular of the species Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Preferred yeasts are Candida, Saccharomyces, Hansenula and Pichia. Preferred fungi are Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Ashbya, Neurospora, Fusarium, Beauveria or other fungi described in Indian Chem. Engr. Section B. Vol 37, No 1,2 (1995) on page 15, Table 6.

Host or starting organisms preferred as transgenic organisms are especially plants. Included within the scope of the invention are all genera and species of the higher and lower plants of the plant kingdom. The mature plants, seeds, shoots and seedlings and also parts, propagation material and cultures, for example cell cultures, derived therefrom are also included. Mature plants means plants at any development stage beyond the seedling. Seedling means a young immature plant in an early development stage.

Annual, perennial, monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants are preferred host organisms for preparing transgenic plants. The expression of genes is furthermore advantageous in all ornamental plants, useful or ornamental trees, flowers, cut flowers, shrubs or lawns. Plants which may be mentioned by way of example but not by limitation are angiosperms, bryophytes such as, for example, Hepaticae (liverworts) and Musci (mosses); pteridophytes such as ferns, horsetail and club mosses; gymnosperms such as conifers, cycades, ginkgo and Gnetalae; algae such as Chlorophyceae, Phaeophpyceae, Rhodophyceae, Myxophyceae, Xanthophyceae, Bacillariophyceae (diatoms) and Euglenophyceae.

Preference is given to plants of the following plant families: Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Carophyllaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Compositae, Cruciferae, Cucurbitaceae, Labiatae, Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Liliaceae, Linaceae, Malvaceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Saxifragaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Solanacea, Sterculiaceae, Tetragoniacea, Theaceae, Umbelliferae. Preferred monocotyledonous plants are in particular selected from the monocotyledonous crop plants, for example of the Gramineae family, such as rice, corn, wheat, or other cereal species such as barley, malt, rye, triticale or oats, and also sugar cane and all grass species. Preferred dicotyledonous plants are in particular selected from the dicotyledonous crop plants, for example: Asteraceae such as sunflower, Tagetes or Calendula and others, Compositae, particularly the genus Lactuca, in particular the species sativa (lettuce), and others, Cruciferae, particularly the genus Brassica, very particularly the species napus (oilseed rape), campestris (beet), oleracea cv Tastie (cabbage), oleracea cv Snowball Y (cauliflower) and oleracea cv Emperor (broccoli), and further cabbage species; and the genus Arabidopsis, very particularly the species thaliana, and also cress or canola, and others, Cucurbitaceae such as melon, pumpkin or zucchini, and others, Leguminosae particularly the genus Glycine, very particularly the species max (soyabean), soya and also alfalfa, pea, bean plants or peanut, and others, Rubiaceae, preferably of the subclass Lamidae, such as, for example, Coffea arabica or Coffea liberica (coffee bush), and others, Solanaceae, in particular the genus Lycopersicon, very particularly the species esculentum (tomato), and the genus Solanum, very particularly the species tuberosum (potato) and melongena (aubergine) and also tobacco or paprika, and others, Sterculiaceae, preferably of the subclass Dilleniidae, such as, for example, Theobroma cacao (cacao bush) and others, Theaceae, preferably of the subclass Dilleniidae, such as, for example, Camellia sinensis or Thea sinensis (tea shrub) and others, Umbelliferae, preferably the genus Daucus, very particularly the species carota (carrot), and Apium (very particularly the species graveolens dulce (celery), and others; and the genus Capsicum, very particularly the species annum (pepper), and others, and also linseed, soya, cotton, hemp, flax, cucumber, spinach, carrot, sugarbeet and the various tree, nut and vine species, in particular banana and kiwi fruit.

Also included are ornamental plants, useful and ornamental trees, flowers, cut flowers, shrubs and lawns. Plants which may be mentioned by way of example but not by limitation are angiosperms, bryophytes such as, for example, Hepaticae (liverworts) and Musci (mosses); pteridophytes such as ferns, horsetail and club mosses; gymnosperms such as conifers, cycades, ginkgo and Gnetalae, the Rosaceae families, such as rose, Ericaceae such as rhododendrons and azaleas, Euphorbiaceae such as poinsettias and croton, Caryophyllaceae such as pinks, Solanaceae such as petunias, Gesneriaceae such as African violet, Balsaminaceae such as catch-me-not, Orchidaceae such as orchids, Iridaceae such as gladioli, iris, freesia and crocus, Compositae such as marigold, Geraniaceae such as gerania, Liliaceae such as dracaena, Moraceae such as ficus, Araceae such as sweetheart plant, and others.

Most preference is given to Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana tabacum, Tagetes erecta, Calendula officinalis and Brassica napus and to all genera and species which are used as food- or feedstuffs, such as the cereal species described, or which are suitable for preparing oils, such as oilseeds (e.g. oilseed rape), nut species, soya, sunflower, pumpkin and peanut.

Plant organisms for the purposes of this invention are furthermore other organisms capable of photosynthetic activity, such as, for example, algae or cyanobacteria, and also mosses. Preferred algae are green algae such as, for example, algae of the genus Haematococcus, Phaedactylum tricornatum, Volvox or Dunaliella.

The preparation of a transformed organism or of a transformed cell requires introducing the appropriate DNA into the appropriate host cell. A multiplicity of methods is available for this process which is referred to as transformation (see also Keown et al. 1990 Methods in Enzymology 185:527-537). Thus, by way of example, the DNA may be introduced directly by microinjection or by bombardment with DNA-coated microparticles. The cell may also be permeabilized chemically, for example using polyethylene glycol, so that the DNA can enter the cell via diffusion. The DNA may also be formed via protoplast fusion with other DNA-comprising units such as minicells, cells, lysosomes or liposomes. Another suitable method for introducing DNA is electroporation in which the cells are reversibly permeabilized by an electric impulse.

In the case of plants, the methods described for transforming and regenerating plants from plant tissues or plant cells are utilized for transient or stable transformation. Suitable methods are especially protoplast transformation by polyethylene glycol-induced DNA uptake, the biolistic method using the gene gun, the “particle bombardment” method, electroporation, the incubation of dry embryos in DNA-comprising solution and microinjection.

Apart from these “direct” transformation techniques, a transformation may also be carried out by bacterial infection by means of Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes. These strains contain a plasmid (Ti or R1 plasmid) which is transferred to the plant after Agrobacteria infection. A part of this plasmid, denoted T-DNA (transferred DNA) is integrated into the genome of the plant cell.

The Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is best suited to dicotyledonous diploid plant cells, whereas the direct transformation techniques are suitable for any cell type.

An expression cassette of the invention may be introduced advantageously into cells, preferably into plant cells, by using vectors.

In an advantageous embodiment, the expression cassette is introduced by means of plasmid vectors. Preference is given to those vectors which enable a stable integration of the expression cassette into the host genome.

In the case of injection or electroporation of DNA into plant cells, no particular demands on the plasmid used are made. It is possible to use simple plasmids such as those of the pUC series. If complete plants are to be regenerated from the transformed cells, it is necessary for an additional selectable marker gene to be present on the plasmid.

Transformation techniques have been described for various monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant organisms. Furthermore, various possible plasmid vectors which normally contain an origin of replication for propagation in E. coli and a marker gene for selection of transformed bacteria are available for introducing foreign genes into plants. Examples are pBR322, pUC series, M13 mp series, pACYC184 etc.

The expression cassette may be introduced into the vector via a suitable restriction cleavage site. The resultant plasmid is first introduced into E. coli. Correctly transformed E. coli cells are selected, cultivated and the recombinant plasmid is obtained using methods familiar to the skilled worker. Restriction analysis and sequencing may be used in order to check the cloning step.

Transformed cells, i.e. those which contain the introduced DNA integrated into the DNA of the host cell may be selected from untransformed cells, if a selectable marker is part of the introduced DNA. A marker may be, by way of example, any gene which is capable of imparting a resistance to antibiotics or herbicides. Transformed cells which express such a marker gene are capable of surviving in the presence of concentrations of an appropriate antibiotic or herbicide, which kill an untransformed wild type. Examples are the bar gene which imparts resistance to the herbicide phosphinothricin (Rathore K S et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 1993 March; 21(5):871-884), the nptII gene which imparts resistance to kanamycin, the hpt gene which imparts resistance to hygromycin and the EPSP gene which imparts resistance to the herbicide glyphosate.

Depending on the method of DNA introduction, further genes may be required on the vector plasmid. If agrobacteria are used, the expression cassette is to be integrated into specific plasmids, either into an intermediate vector (shuttle vector) or a binary vector. If, for example, a Ti or Ri plasmid is to be used for transformation, at least the right border, in most cases, however, the right and the left border, of the Ti or Ri plasmid T-DNA is connected as flanking region with the expression cassette to be introduced. Preference is given to using binary vectors. Binary vectors can replicate both in E. coli and in Agrobacterium. They normally contain a selection marker gene and a linker or polylinker flanked by the right and left T-DNA border sequences. They may be transformed directly into Agrobacterium (Holsters et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 163 (1978), 181-187). The selection marker gene permits selection of transformed Agrobacteria; an example is the nptII gene which imparts a resistance to kanamycin. The Agrobacterium which in this case acts as the host organism should already contain a plasmid with the vir region. This region is required for the transfer of T-DNA into the plant cell. An Agrobacterium transformed in this way may be used for transformation of plant cells.

The use of T-DNA for transformation of plant cells has been intensely studied and described (EP 120516; Hoekema, In: The Binary Plant Vector System, Offsetdrukkerij Kanters B. V., Alblasserdam, Chapter V; Fraley et al., Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci., 4:1-46 and An et al., EMBO J. 4 (1985), 277-287). Various binary vectors are known and partly commercially available, such as, for example, pBIN19 (Clontech Laboratories, Inc. U.S.A.).

The DNA is transferred into the plant cell by coculturing plant explants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Starting from infected plant material (e.g. leaf, root or stem parts, but also protoplasts or plant cell suspensions), it is possible to regenerate whole plants by using a suitable medium which may contain, for example, antibiotics or biocides for selection of transformed cells. The plants obtained may then be screened for the presence of the introduced DNA, in this case the expression cassette of the invention. As soon as the DNA has integrated into the host genome, the corresponding genotype is normally stable and the corresponding insertion is also found again in subsequent generations. Normally, the integrated expression cassette contains a selection marker which imparts to the transformed plant a resistance to a biocide (for example a herbicide), a metabolism inhibitor such as 2-DOG or an antibiotic such as kanamycin, G 418, bleomycin, hygromycin or phosphinothricin etc. The selection marker allows the selection of transformed cells from untransformed cells (McCormick et al., (1986) Plant Cell Reports 5: 81-84). The plants obtained may be cultivated and crossed in the common manner. Two or more generations should be cultured in order to ensure that the genomic integration is stable and heritable.

The abovementioned methods are described, for example, in B. Jenes et al., Techniques for Gene Transfer, in: Transgenic Plants, Vol. 1, Engineering and Utilization, edited by S. D. Kung and R. Wu, Academic Press (1993), pp. 128-143 and in Potrykus, (1991) Annu Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Molec. Biol. 42: 205-225). The construct to be expressed is preferably cloned into a vector which is suitable for transforming Agrobacterium tumefaciens, for example pBin19 (Bevan et al., (1984) Nucl. Acids Res. 12: 871 f.).

As soon as a transformed plant cell has been prepared, it is possible to obtain a complete plant by using methods known to the skilled worker. To this end, callus cultures are used as starting point, by way of example. From these still undifferentiated cell masses, it is possible to induce formation of shoot and root in the known manner. The shoots obtained can be planted out and cultivated.

The efficacy of expression of the nucleic acids to be expressed transgenically can be determined, for example, in vitro by shoot meristem propagation using one of the above-described selection methods.

The invention further relates to cells, cell cultures, parts, such as, for example, roots, leaves, etc. in the case of transgenic plant organisms, and transgenic propagation material such as seeds or fruits derived from the above-described transgenic organisms.

Genetically modified plants of the invention, which can be consumed by humans and animals, may also be used, for example directly or after preparation known per se, as foodstuffs or feedstuffs.

The invention further relates to the use of the above-described transgenic organisms of the invention and of the cells, cell cultures, parts, such as, for example, roots, leaves, etc., in the case of transgenic plant organisms, and transgenic propagation material such as seeds or fruits for the production of food- or feedstuffs, pharmaceuticals or fine chemicals.

Preference is further given to a method for the recombinant production of pharmaceuticals or fine chemicals in host organisms, in which a host organism is transformed with one of the above-described expression cassettes or vectors and said expression cassette contains one or more structural genes which code for the fine chemical of interest or catalyze the biosynthesis of the fine chemical of interest, and the transformed host organism is cultivated and the fine chemical of interest is isolated from the cultivation medium. This method is broadly applicable for fine chemicals such as enzymes, vitamins, amino acids, sugars, fatty acids, natural and synthetic flavorings, aromatizing substances and colorants. Particular preference is given to the production of tocopherols and tocotrienols and also carotenoids. Cultivation of the transformed host organisms and isolation from said host organisms or from the cultivation medium are carried out by means of the methods known to the skilled worker. The production of pharmaceuticals such as, for example, antibodies or vaccines is described in Hood E E, Jilka J M (1999). Curr Opin Biotechnol. 10(4):382-6; Ma J K, Vine N D (1999) Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 236:275-92.

Sequences:

SEQ ID NO: 1 Promoter and 5′-untranslated region of the Arabidopsis thaliana pFD promoter. SEQ ID NO: 2 Promoter and 5′-untranslated region of the Arabidopsis thaliana FNR promoter. SEQ ID NO: 3 Promoter and 5′-untranslated region of the Arabidopsis thaliana TPT promoter (2038 bp). SEQ ID NO: 4 Promoter and 5′-untranslated region of the truncated Arabidopsis thaliana pFDs promoter. SEQ ID NO: 5 Nucleic acids coding for a phosphinothricin acetyltransferase. SEQ ID NO: 6 Amino acid sequence coding for a phosphinothricin acetyltransferase. SEQ ID NO: 7 Nucleic acid coding for an acetolactate synthase. SEQ ID NO: 8 Amino acid sequence coding for an acetolacate synthase. SEQ ID NO: 9-oligonucleotide primer pWL35 5′-GTC GAC GAA TTC GAG AGA CAG AGA GAC GG-3′ SEQ ID NO: 10-oligonucleotide primer pWL36 5′-GTC GAC GGT ACC GAT TCA AGC TTC ACT GC-3′ SEQ ID NO: 11-oligonucleotide primer pFD1 5′-GAG AAT TCG ATT CAA GCT TCA CTG C-3′ SEQ ID NO: 12-oligonucleotide primer pFD2 5′-CCA TGG GAG AGA CAG AGA GAC G-3′ SEQ ID NO: 13-oligonucleotide primer pFD3 5′-acggatccgagagacagagagacggagacaaaa-3′ SEQ ID NO: 14-oligonucleotide primer pFD5 5′-gcggatccaacactcttaacaccaaatcaaca-3′ SEQ ID NO: 15-oligonucleotide primer L-FNR ara 5′-GTCGACGGATCCGGTTGATCAGAAGAAGAAGAAGAAG ATGAACT-3′ SEQ ID NO: 16-oligonucleotide primer R-FNR ara 5′-GTCGACTCTAGATTCATTATTTCGATTTTGATTTCGT GACC-3′ SEQ ID NO: 17-oligonucleotide primer L-TPT ara 5′-AGTCGACGGATCCATAACCAAAAGAACTCTGATCATGT ACGTACCCATT-3′ SEQ ID NO: 18-oligonucleotide primer R-TPT ara 5′-AGACGTCGACTCTAGATGAAATCGAAATTCAGAGT TTTGA TAGTGAGAGC-3′ SEQ ID NO: 19-oligonucleotide primer ubi5 5′-CCAAACCATGGTAAGTTTGTCTAAAGCTTA-3′ SEQ ID NO: 20-oligonucleotide primer ubi3 5′-CGGATCCTTTTGTGTTTCGTCTTCTCTCA-CG-3′ SEQ ID NO: 21-oligonucleotide primer sqs5 5′-GTCTAGAGGCAAACCACCGAGTGTT-3′ SEQ ID NO: 22. oligonucleotide primer sqs3 5′-CGGTACCTGTTTCCAGAAAATTTTGATTCAG-3′ SEQ ID NO: 23 binary plasmid pSUN3 (Sungene GmbH & Co KGaA) SEQ ID NO: 24 binary plasmid pSUN5NPTIICat (Sungene GmbH & Co KGaA) SEQ ID NO: 25 binary plasmid pSUN3PatNos (Sungene GmbH & Co KGaA) SEQ ID NO: 26-oligonucleotide primer 5-TPTara 5′-AAG TCG ACG GAT CCT GAT AGC TTA TAC TCA AAT TCA ACA AGT TAT-3′ SEQ ID NO: 27 truncated promoter and 5′-untranslated region of the Arabidopsis thaliana and TPT-Promoters (1318 bp) SEQ ID NO: 28 nucleic acid sequence of the terminator of the potato cathepsin D inhibitor gene (GenBank Acc. No. X74985) SEQ ID NO: 29 nucleic acid sequence of the terminator of the field bean storage protein gene VfLE1B3 (GenBank Acc. No. Z26489).

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 a-c: The TPT and the FNR promoters show a comparable expression pattern in green tissue and in flowers of tobacco and potato. GUS-histochemical stains are formed. The intensity of the GUS blue stain corresponds to the shades of gray displayed. The figures show:

In FIG. 1 a:

A: Potato leaves with a homogeneous intensity stain over the entire leaf region.

B: Tobacco petioles, intensive blue stain, especially on the edges and in the vascular regions (see arrow).

In FIG. 1 b:

C: Tobacco stems, intensive blue stains, especially on the edges (see arrow). D: Tobacco internodia.

In FIG. 1 c:

E: Tobacco flower; blue stain, especially in sepals and petals.

FIG. 2 a-b: The TPT promoter and the FNR promoter show a different expression pattern in vegetative and germinative storage tissue of tobacco and potato. While the TPT promoter is active here, the FNR promoter shows no expression. GUS histochemical stains of tobacco seeds and tobacco seedlings and also of potato tubers are shown. However, both promoters exhibit again a comparable activity in seedlings. The intensity of the GUS blue stain corresponds to the shades of gray displayed. The figures show:

In FIG. 2 a:

A: Tobacco seeds. In the case of the TPT promoter, individual blue stained seeds are visible (see arrow). In the case of the FNR promoter, no stains are detectable.

B: Potato tubers. In the case of the TPT promoter, a homogenous strong blue stain of the potato tuber is visible. In the case of the FNR promoter, only a very weak stain is detectable, if at all.

In FIG. 2 b:

C: Tobacco seedlings (10 days old). Both promoters show a comparable blue stain (see arrow).

Expression cassettes for the expression of kanamycin-resistance (nptII) and phosphinothricin-resistance (pat) markers. Cassette A permits expression of kanamycin resistance under the TPT or FNR promoter, in addition to a phosphinothricin resistance under the NOS promoter. Cassette B permits expression of phosphinothricin resistance under the TPT or FNR promoter, in addition to kanamycin resistance under the NOS promoter.

LB, RB: left and right border, respectively, of Agrobacterium T-DNA

nosP: NOS promoter

pat: nucleic acid sequence coding for phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (pat)

nptII: kanamycin resistance gene (Neomycin phosphotransferase)

nosT: NOS terminator

FNR-P: FNR promoter

TPT-P: TPT promoter

Regeneration of transformed tobacco plumulae under kanamycin selection pressure (100 mg/l kanamycin). A: transformation with an FNR promoter-nptII construct. B: transformation with a TPT promoter-nptII construct. A comparable efficient regeneration of transformed tobacco plants was observed.

Germination of transformed tobacco plants from transgenic tobacco seeds under phosphinothricin selection pressure (10 mg/l phosphinotricin).

A: transformed with an FNR promoter-pat construct.

B: transformed with a TPT promoter-pat construct.

C: control with untransformed tobacco seeds.

A comparably efficient germination of tobacco plants transformed with the FNR promoter-pat construct and the TPT promoter-pat construct was observed, while untransformed tobacco plants treated in a corresponding manner had no resistance.

The following examples illustrate embodiments of the invention, but should not be viewed as limiting the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES General Methods

The chemical synthesis of oligonucleotides may be carried out in a manner known per se, for example according to the phosphoramidite method (Voet, 2^(nd) edition, Wiley Press New York, pages 896-897). The cloning steps carried out within the framework of the present invention, such as, for example, restriction cleavages, agarose gel electrophoreses, purification of DNA fragments, transfer of nucleic acids to nitrocellulose and nylon membranes, ligation of DNA fragments, transformation of E. coli cells, cultivation of bacteria, propagation of phages and sequence analysis of recombinant DNA, are carried out as described in Sambrook et al. (1989) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISBN 0-87969-309-6. Recombinant DNA molecules are sequenced according to the method of Sanger (Sanger et al. (1977) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463-5467), using a laser fluorescence DNA sequencer from ABI.

Example 1 Isolation of Genomic DNA from Arabidopsis thaliana (CTAB Method)

Genomic DNA is isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana by grinding approx. 0.25 g of leaf material of young plants in the vegetative state in liquid nitrogen to give a fine powder. The pulverulent plant material is introduced together with 1 ml of 65° C. CTAB I buffer (CTAB: hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, also called cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; Sigma Cat.-No.: H6269) and 20 μl of β-mercaptoethanol into a prewarmed second mortar and, after complete homogenization, the extract is transferred to a 2 ml Eppendorf vessel and incubated with careful regular mixing at 65° C. for 1 h. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture is extracted with 1 ml of chloroform/octanol (24:1, equilibrated by shaking with 1 M Tris/HCl, pH8.0) by slowly inverting the vessel and the phases are separated by centrifugation at 8,500 rpm (7,500×g) and room temperature for 5 min. Subsequently, the aqueous phase is extracted again with 1 ml of chloroform/octanol, centrifuged and carefully mixed with 1/10 volume of CTAB II buffer prewarmed to 65° C. by inverting the vessel. One ml of chloroform/octanol mixture (see above) is then added with careful agitation to the reaction mixture and the phases are again separated by centrifugation at 8,500 rpm (7,500×g) and room temperature for 5 min. The aqueous lower phase is transferred to a fresh Eppendorf vessel and the upper organic phase is again centrifuged in a fresh Eppendorf vessel at 8,500 rpm (7,500×g) and room temperature for 15 min. The aqueous phase resulting herefrom is combined with the aqueous phase of the previous centrifugation step and the entire reaction mixture is then mixed with exactly the same volume of prewarmed CTAB III buffer. This is followed by an incubation at 65° C. until the DNA precipitates in flakes. This may continue for up to 1 h or be affected by incubation at 37° C. overnight. The sediment resulting from the subsequent centrifugation step (5 min, 2000 rpm (500×g), 4.degree° is admixed with 250 μl of CTAB IV buffer prewarmed to 65.degree. C., and the mixture is incubated at 65° C. for at least 30 min or until the sediment has completely dissolved. The DNA is then precipitated by mixing the solution with 2.5 volumes of ice-cold ethanol and incubating at −20° C. for 1 h. As an alternative, the reaction mixture is mixed with 0.6 volumes of isopropanol and, without further incubation, immediately centrifuged at 8,500 rpm (7,500×g) and 4° C. for 15 min. The sedimented DNA is washed twice with in each case 1 ml of 80% strength ice-cold ethanol by inverting the Eppendorf vessel, each washing step being followed by another centrifugation (5 min, 8,500 rpm (7,500×g), 4° C.) and the DNA pellet is then dried in air for approx. 15 min Finally, the DNA is resuspended in 100 μl of TE comprising 100 μg/ml RNase and the mixture is incubated at room temperature for 30 min. After another incubation phase at 4° C. overnight, the DNA solution is homogeneous and can be used for subsequent experiments.

Solution for CTAB:

Solution I (for 200 ml):

100 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0 (2.42 g)

1.4 M NaCl (16.36 g)

20 mM EDTA (8.0 ml of 0.5 M stock solution)

2% (w/v) CTAB (4.0 g)

The following is added in each case prior to use: 2% β-mercaptoethanol (20 μl for 1 ml of solution I).

Solution II (for 200 ml):

0.7 MNaCl (8.18 g)

10% (w/v) CTAB (20 g)

Solution III (for 200 ml):

50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0 (1.21 g)

10 mM EDTA (4 ml 0.5 M of 0.5 M stock solution)

1% (w/v) CTAB (2.0 g)

Solution IV (High-Salt TE) (for 200 ml):

10 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0 (0.242 g)

0.1 mM EDTA (40 μl of 0.5 M stock solution)

1 M NaCl (11.69 g)

Chloroform/Octanol (24:1) (for 200 ml):

192 ml of chloroform

8 ml of octanol

The mixture is equilibrated by shaking 2× with 1 M Tris/HCl pH 8.0 and stored protected from light.

Example 2 Transformation of Tobacco, Oilseed Rape and Potato

Tobacco was transformed via infection with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. According to the method developed by Horsch (Horsch et al. (1985) Science 227: 1229-1231). All constructs used for transformation were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens by using the freeze/thaw method (repeated thawing and freezing). The Agrobacterium colonies comprising the desired construct were selected on mannitol/glutamate medium comprising 50 μg/ml kanamycin, 50 μg/ml ampicillin and 25 μg/ml rifampicin.

Tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Samsun N N) were transformed by centrifuging 10 ml of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens overnight culture grown under selection, discarding the supernatant and resuspending the bacteria in the same volume of antibiotics-free medium. Leaf disks of sterile plants (approx. 1 cm in diameter) were bathed in this bacteria solution in a sterile Petri dish. The leaf disks were then laid out in Petri dishes on MS medium (Murashige and Skoog (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473ff.) comprising 2% sucrose and 0.8% Bacto agar. After incubation in the dark at 25° C. for 2 days, they were transferred to MS medium comprising 100 mg/l kanamycin, 500 mg/i Claforan, 1 mg/l benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.2 mg/l naphthylacetic acid (NAA), 1.6% glucose and 0.8% Bacto agar and cultivation was continued (16 hours light/8 hours dark). Growing shoots were transferred to hormone-free MS medium comprising 2% sucrose, 250 mg/l Claforan and 0.8% Bacto agar.

Oilseed rape was transformed by means of petiole transformation according to Moloney et al. (Moloney M M, Walker J M & Sharma K K (1989) Plant Cell Reports 8:238-242).

Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) were transformed by infecting leaf disks and internodia of in vitro plants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens in liquid Murashige Skoog Medium for 20 minutes and then coculturing them in the dark for 2 d. After coculturing, the explants were cultured on solid MS medium which contains instead of sucrose 1.6% glucose (MG) and which has been supplemented with 5 mg/l NAA, 0.1 mg/l BAP, 250 mg/l Timentin and 30 to 40 mg/l kanamycin (KIM), at 21° C. in a 16 h light/8 h dark rhythm. After this callus phase, the explants were placed on shoot induction medium (SIM). SIM was composed as follows: MG+2 mg/l Zeatinriboside, 0.02 mg/l NAA, 0.02 mg/l GA3, 250 mg/l Timentin, 30 to 40 mg/l kanamycin. Every two weeks, the explants were transferred to fresh SIM. The developing shoots were rooted on MS medium comprising 2% sucrose and 250 mg/l Timentin and 30 to 40 mg/l kanamycin.

Example 3 Studies on the Suitability of the Putative Ferredoxin (pFD) Promoter

Cloning of the pFD Promoters from Arabidopsis thaliana

The putative ferredoxin promoter was amplified from genomic Arabidopsis thaliana DNA by means of PCR using the primers pWL35 and pWL36. The primer pWL35 starts with the SalI and EcoRI restriction cleavage sites which are located immediately upstream of the coding region of the pFD gene and are highlighted in bold type. The primer pWL36 starts with the SalI and Asp718 restriction cleavage sites highlighted in bold type.

Primer pWL35 (SEQ ID NO: 9) 5′ GTC GAC GAA TTC GAG AGA CAG AGA GAC GG 3′ Primer pWL36 (SEQ ID NO: 10) 5′ GTC GAC GGT ACC GAT TCA AGC TTC ACT GC 3′

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   1 μl Genomic Arabidopsis DNA (approx. 250 ng)     -   0.5 μl Tth polymerase (2 U/.mu.l)     -   3 μl Mg(OAc)₂ (25 mM, final conc. 1.5 mM Mg²⁺)     -   15.2 μl 3.3× buffer     -   4 μl dNTPs (2.5 mM each, Takara, final concentration: 200 μM         each)     -   24.3 μl H₂O

PCR Conditions:

-   -   1 cycle at 95° C. for 3 min     -   10 cycles at 94° C. for 10 s, 50° C. for 20 s and 72° C. for 1         min     -   20 cycles at 94° C. for 10 s, 65° C. for 20 s and 72° C. for 1         min     -   1 cycle at 72° C. for 5 min.—followed by cooling to 4° C. until         further use.

b) Construction of the pFD Promoter-GUS Expression Cassette.

The PCR product of the pFD promoter was cloned into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen) and subsequently isolated by means of the SalI restriction cleavage sites introduced by the pair of primers and purified by gel electrophoresis. For fusion with the GUS gene, the approx. 850 bp pFD promoter fragment was cloned into the Sail-cut binary vector pBI101.2 (Clontech Inc.) and the orientation of the fragment was subsequently verified on the basis of restriction analyses using the endonucleases BglII and BamHI. The resulting plasmid pFD::GUS was transformed into tobacco. The tobacco plants generated were denoted pFD:GUS.

c) Construction of the pFD Promoter-NptII Expression Cassette.

The putative ferredoxin promoter was amplified from genomic Arabidopsis thaliana DNA by means of PCR. The primers were used to add the restriction sites EcoRI and NcoI.

Primer pFD1 (SEQ ID NO: 11) 5′ GAG AAT TCG ATT CAA GCT TCA CTG C Primer pFD2 (SEQ ID NO: 12) 5′ CCA TGG GAG AGA CAG AGA GAC G

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   37.5 μl H₂O     -   5.0 μl 10× reaction buffer (final concentration Mg²⁺ 1.5 mM)     -   4.0 μl dNTP mix (2.5 mM each)     -   1.0 μl Primer pFD1 (10 μM)     -   1.0 μl Primer pFD2 (10 μM)     -   0.5 μl Taq polymerase (Takara, 2 U/μl)     -   1.0 μl genomic Arabidopsis DNA (approx. 250 ng)

PCR Conditions:

-   -   cycle at 94° C. for 3 min     -   cycles at 94° C. for 10 s, 48° C. for 20 s and 72° C. for 1 min.     -   cycles at 94° C. for 10 s, 65° C. for 20 s and 72° C. for 1 min.     -   cycle at 72° C. for 5 min.

The PCR product was subcloned into the pCRII plasmid (Invitrogen). The plasmid pCAMBIA 2300 (CAMBIA, GPO Box 3200, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia; GenBank Acc. No: AF234315; Binary vector pCAMBIA-2300, complete sequence; Hajdukiewicz P et al. (1994) Plant Mol Biol 25(6):989-994) was cut with EcoRI/NcoI and the pFD promoter fragment was cloned as EcoRI/NcoI fragment from the pCRII plasmid into this vector. In the process, the 35S promoter was removed from the Cambia vector. The resulting plasmid was referred to as pFD promoter:NPTII and transformed into tobacco.

Results of GUS Analysis of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

In the context of histochemical investigations, transgenic pFD::GUS tobacco plants showed strong GUS staining in source leaves and weak GUS staining in the tissues of all flower organs. Strong staining in root tissue was only observed in in vitro plants whose roots had been exposed to the illumination. Callus growth was induced on the basis of leaf disks which had been punched out of plants identified as pFD::GUS-positive. The callus tissue and also the plant shoots developing therefrom showed GUS staining whose intensity was comparable to that of the GUS staining of CaMV35S::GUS (in pCambia 1304; CAMBIA, GPO Box 3200, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia; GenBank Acc. No.: AF234300, Binary vector pCAMBIA-1304, complete sequence, Hajdukiewicz P et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25(6):989-994) (1994)) transgenic plants. The table listed below (Table 3) summarizes the data of quantifying the GUS activity in the anthers and source leaves of selected transgenic pFD::GUS tobacco plants.

TABLE 3 Quantification of GUS activity in anthers and source leaves of selected transgenic pFD::GUS tobacco plants. GUS-Activity (pmol [4 MU]/mg[protein]/min) pFD::GUS Plant no. Anthers ‘Source’ leaves pFD5 275 3785 pFD11 174 6202 pFD14 362 2898 pFD15 57 2678

The anthers of the mature flowers display no promoter activity. Said activity is weak in closed flowers.

e) Results of the Analysis of Kanamycin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

In order to study the pFD promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to kanamycin, the pFD promoter:NPTII plasmid was transformed into tobacco. The tobacco plants were selectively regenerated on kanamycin (100 mg/l). The plants regenerated from the developing plumulae comprised kanamycin, demonstrating that the pFD promoter had expressed the NPTII gene and thus made selection possible. The results demonstrate that the isolated nucleic acid sequence has the desired advantageous promoter properties, i.e. it exhibits a promoter activity which is suitable for expressing selection markers effectively and its activity in the pollen is low. The activity in the anthers is normally less than 10% of the activity in the source leaves.

f) Results of GUS Analysis of the Transgenic Potato Plants.

The pFD:GUS plasmid (cf. Example 3b) is transformed into potatoes according to the method described in Example 2.

Result of functional studies: The pFD promoter is strongly expressed in the leaves of the transgenic potato plants analyzed. GUS staining was found to be stronger in the leaves of the potato plants than in the leaves of the tobacco plants described. Weak staining of the flowers and no staining of the tubers indicated low expression in the flowers and no expression in the tubers, respectively.

The data demonstrate that this promoter has no activity in the tubers of potato plants and is suitable for the expression of genes, for example of insecticides, in the leaves and other organs above the ground of plants, whose gene products are unwanted in the storage organs.

Preparation of Deletion Variants of the pFD Promoter.

A further pFD promoter variant is the deletion pFD-short (pFds). For this purpose, the pFD promoter section from base pairs 137 to 837 was amplified using the following primers:

pFD3 (SEQ ID NO: 13): 5′-acggatccgagagacagagagacggagacaa-aa-3′: pFD5 (SEQ ID NO: 14): 5′gcggatccaacactataacaccaaatcaaca-3′:

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   37.5 μl H₂O     -   5.0 μl 10× reaction buffer (“genomic PCR”)     -   4.0 μl dNTP mix (2.5 mM each)     -   2.2 μl 25 mM Mg(OAc).sub.2 (final concentration 1.1 mM)     -   1.0 μl Primer pFD3 (10 μM)     -   1.0 μl Primer pFD5 (10 μM)     -   0.5 μl Pfu-turbo polymerase mix     -   1.0 μl Genomic Arabidopsis DNA (approx. 250 ng)

PCR Conditions:

-   -   cycle at 95° C. for 5 min     -   25 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s, 50° C. for 60 s and 72° C. for 1         min.     -   cycle at 50° C. for 60 s, 72° C. for 10 min, followed by cooling         to 4° C. until further use.

The primers comprised recognition sequences for the restriction enzyme BamHI. After BamHI cleavage, the PCR product was ligated into the plasmid pGUSINT37 (see above) which had likewise been cut with BamHI and had been dephosphorylated. Tobacco leaves were bombarded with the resulting construct pFDsGUSINT by means of Biolistics (BioRad). In this connection, microcarriers (25 μg of Gold, Heraeus 0.3 to 3 μm) were treated with 10 μg of plasmid DNA, 2.5 M CaCl₂, and 0.1 M spermidine, washed with alcohol and fired at the leaves which were lying on MS medium under a vacuum of 26 inches and a pressure of 1100 psi. The explants were then incubated in MS medium comprising 2% sucrose for 24 h and then histochemically stained with X-gluc. Blue spots indicated the activity of the promoter.

Fusing the pFDs Promoter to the NPTII Gene.

The pFDs promoter is excised as BamHI fragment from pFDsGUSINT and its ends are rendered blunt by means of Klenow-“Fill-In.” The fragment obtained is cloned upstream of the NPTII gene of the EcoRV-cut and dephosphorylated plasmid pSUN5NPTIICat (SEQ ID NO: 24). The plasmid pSUN5NPTII is a derivative of plasmid pSUN3 (SEQ ID NO: 23), which contains, apart from nosP/Pat cassette, also a promoterless NPTII gene. This construct makes it possible to assay promoters on their ability to express NPTII. Selection on phosphinothricin-comprising medium may be carried out in parallel.

The resulting plasmid pSun5FdsNPTII is transformed into tobacco. Regenerated and selected shoots showed that the pFDs promoter allows selection for NPTII.

Example 4 Studies on the Suitability of the Ferredoxin NADPH Oxidoreductase (FNR) Promoter

Cloning of the FNR Promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana.

The putative promoter region of the FNR gene was amplified from genomic DNA by using the oligonucleotide primers L-FNRara and R-FNRara, bypassing the ATG start codon of the FNR gene and retaining four putative stop codons of the open reading frame located upstream. Using the primers L-FNRara and R-FNRara, the FNR promoter was amplified as a 635 bp fragment corresponding to the section of the clone K2A18.15 from position 69493 to position 70127 (including these two nucleotides) from genomic Arabidopsis thaliana DNA by means of PCR. The primer L-FNRara starts with the restriction cleavage sites SalI and BamHI highlighted in bold type and is located upstream of the four stop codons of the gene located upstream of the FNR promoter. The primer R-FNRara starts with the SalI and XbaI restriction cleavage sites which are located immediately upstream of the ATG start codon of the FNR gene and are highlighted in bold type.

Primer L-FNR ara (44 mer) (SEQ ID NO: 15): 5′ GTC GAC GGA TCC GGT TGA TCA GAA GAA GAA GAA GAA GAT GAA CT 3′ Primer R-FNR ara (41 mer) (SEQ ID NO: 16): 5′ GTC GAC TCT AGA TTC ATT ATT TCG ATT TTG ATT TCG TGA CC 3′

The FNR promoter was amplified using a “touchdown” PCR protocol with the use of the ‘Advantage Genomic Polymerase Mix’ (Clontech Laboratories, Inc; Catalogue No. #8418-1). The above-mentioned polymerase mix contains a thermostable DNA polymerase from Thermus thermophilus (Tth DNA polymerase), mixed with a smaller proportion of Vent proofreading 3′-5′ polymerase, and the Tth start antibody which makes hot-start PCR possible.

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   36.8 μl H₂O     -   5 μl 10× reaction buffer (“genomic PCR”)     -   1 μl dNTP mix (10 mM each)     -   2.2 μl 25 mM Mg(OAc)² (final concentration 1.1 mM)     -   1 μl Primer L-FNR ara (10 μM)     -   1 μl Primer R-FNR ara (10 μM)     -   1 μl 50× polymerase mix     -   2 μl Genomic Arabidopsis DNA (approx. 500 ng)

PCR Conditions:

-   -   1 cycle at 94° C. for 1 min     -   10 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s and 70° C. for 3 min.     -   32 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s and 65° C. for 3 min.     -   1 cycle at 65° C. for 4 min.—followed by cooling to 4° C. until         further use.

Construction of the FNR Promoter-GUS Expression Cassette.

After gel-electrophoretic fractionation and purification from the gel using the Quiagen PCR purification kit, the PCR product of the FNR promoter was cloned into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen) via TA cloning The promoter fragment was then isolated from the resulting plasmid pATFNR1 bp digestion with XbaI/BamHI by means of the XbaI and BamHI restriction cleavage sites introduced by the pair of primers and purified by gel electrophoresis. For fusion with the GUS gene, the approx. 600 bp FNR promoter fragment was cloned into the XbaI/BamHI-digested binary vector pBI101. The correct insertion of the correct fragment in the resulting plasmid pATFNR-Bi was then verified on the basis of a restriction analysis using the endonuclease EcoRV. The plasmid pATFNR-Bi was used for transformation of tobacco.

For transformation in oilseed rape, the FNR promoter was cloned as SalI fragment of plasmid pCR_ATFNR into the vector pS3NitGUS cut with SalI and XhoI, thereby replacing the nitrilase promoter.

Construction of the FNR Promoter-PAT Expression Cassette.

In order to study the FNR promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to phosphinothricin, the FNR promoter was cloned as SalI fragment from plasmid pATFNR1 into the SalI-cut plasmid pSUN3 PatNos (SEQ ID NO: 25) upstream of the phosphinothricin resistance gene.

Construction of the FNR Promoter-NptII Expression Cassette.

In order to impart resistance to kanamycin, the FNR promoter was cloned as SalI fragment into the Xha-cut dephosphorylated plasmid pSUN5NptIICat (Sungene GmbH & Co KGaA, SEQ ID NO: 24) upstream of the NPTII resistance gene. The resulting plasmid is referred to as pS5FNRNptII and was transformed into tobacco and oilseed rape.

Results of GUS Analysis of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

Qualitative data: Transgenic FNR::GUS-Tobacco plants displayed strong GUS expression in all green tissues, especially in source leaves, leaf stalks and internodia, and also in all flower organs of fully developed flowers, (ovary, stigma, sepals and petals) with the exception of pollen which showed no GUS activity; a low staining intensity was detected in anthers. In the first analysis of leaf disks of 80 in vitro plants, 70 plants displayed strong GUS staining with low variation in staining intensity between the individual plants. This was regarded as an indication that the FNR promoter contains an element which provides limited positional effects. In the tissue culture plants, the GUS activity of the FNR::GUS plants was markedly lower than the activity of TPT::GUS plants. Transgenic oilseed rape plants displayed the same staining pattern.

Seed material (F1) of the lines FNR 13, FNR 45 and FNR 28 was analyzed with respect to its GUS activity. It turned out that GUS activity was detected neither in resting seeds nor in growing seedlings (3.5 days after sowing).

In later seedlings stages (6 and 10 days after sowing), strong GUS activity was detected in the cotyledons and in the upper region of the seedling axis, whereas no GUS staining was detected in the roots. In seedlings which had been cultivated in the dark, GUS activity was limited to the cotyledons and was overall lower than in the light-germinated seedlings.

Quantitative analysis of the GUS activity in FNR::GUS transgenic tobacco plants (transformed with plasmid pATFNR-Bi) was analyzed on the first fully developed leaves of tobacco plants 21 days after transfer from the tissue culture to the greenhouse. The data corresponds to the average of four independent measurements.

TABLE 4 Quantification of GUS activity in leaf material of selected transgenic FNR::GUS tobacco plants (transformed with plasmid pATFNR-Bi). Rank (x-strongest GUS Activity FNR::GUS GUS activity (pmol 4-MU/mg Standard Plant No. among 50 plants) Protein/min) deviation 13 1 86491 2974 45 2 41726 1829 14 7 23951 2443 28 9 22148 401 17 10 21557 1157 30 20 13444 744 40 26 11972 1144 25 35 7662 519 35 39 5643 96 21 43 2858 194 C2-(WT) 49 28 4

f) Result of Analysis of Phosphinothricin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

The plasmid pSUN3FNRPat was used for transformation of tobacco by using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA101, as described under 3. The tobacco plants are selectively regenerated either on phosphinothricin (5 mg/l) or, as a control, on kanamycin (100 mg/l). 97% of explants selected under kanamycin pressure (nosP:NPTII) and 40% of explants selected under phosphinothricin pressure (FNR:Bar) developed plumulae. The plants regenerated under phosphinothricin pressure comprised both the kanamycin and the phosphinothricin gene, demonstrating that the FNR promoter had expressed the phosphinothricin acetyltransferase gene and thus made selection possible. Seeds of the transgenic tobacco plants were laid out on MS medium comprising 10 mg/l phosphinothricin and the rate of germination was determined. In contrast to the control of untransformed tobacco seeds, the seedlings developed normally. The gene of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, which had been transferred and expressed via the FNR promoter, was detected in the progeny of said lines by means of PCR. The results demonstrated that the isolated nucleic acid sequence has the desired advantageous promoter properties, i.e. it shows a promoter activity which is suitable for expressing selection markers effectively and has no activity in pollen.

g) Results of the Analysis of Kanamycin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco and Oilseed Rape Plants.

In order to study the FNR promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to kanamycin, the FNR promoter was combined with the NptII gene. The resulting construct pS5FNRNptII was transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 [mp 90] for transformation in tobacco and oilseed rape.

Seeds of the transgenic tobacco plants were laid out on MS medium comprising 100 mg/l kanamycin and the rate of germination was determined. In contrast to the control of untransformed tobacco seeds, the seedlings developed normally. The gene of neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII), which had been transferred and expressed via the FNR promoter, was detected in the progeny of said lines by means of PCR.

The resulting strains have been used for transformation, as described under Example 2. Selective regeneration was achieved in the presence of 100 mg/l (or 18 mg/l in the case of oilseed rape) kanamycin. The plants regenerated under kanamycin pressure comprised both the kanamycin and the phosphinothricin gene, demonstrating that the FNR promoter had expressed the NptII gene and thus made selection of the plants possible.

The results demonstrated that the isolated nucleic acid sequence has the desired advantageous promoter properties, i.e. it shows a promoter activity which is suitable for expressing selection markers effectively and has no activity in pollen.

Results of GUS Analysis of the Transgenic Potato Plants.

The analysis of putatively transgenic potato plants showed in 20 lines a strong GUS staining in the leaves, comparable to the expression pattern of tobacco plants. With the exception of 5 plants which showed a very weak staining in the potato tubers, no FNR promoter expression was detected in the remaining plants.

The data demonstrate that this promoter has very weak, if any, activity in the storage organs of potato plants and is suitable for the expression of genes, for example of insecticides, in the leaves and other organs above the ground of plants, whose gene products are unwanted in the storage organs.

Example 5 Studies on the Suitability of the Triose Phosphate Translocator (TPT) Promoter

Cloning of the TPT Promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana.

The putative promoter region of the TPT gene from Arabidopsis thaliana was isolated by amplification using the oligonucleotide primers L-TPTara and R-TPTara, the ATG start codon of the TPT gene being bypassed. Using the primers L-TPTara and R-TPTara, the TPT promoter was amplified as a 2038 bp fragment from genomic Arabidopsis thaliana DNA by means of PCR (SEQ ID NO: 3). The primer L-TPTara starts with the SalI and BamHI restriction cleavage sites highlighted in bold type. The primer R-TPTara starts with the AatII, SalI and XbaI restriction cleavage sites which are located immediately upstream of the ATG start codon of the TPT gene and are highlighted in bold type.

Primer L-TPTara (SEQ ID NO: 17): 5′ AAG TCG ACG GAT CCA TAA CCA AAA GAA CTC TGA TCA TGT ACG TAC CCA TT 3′ Primer R-TPTara (SEQ ID NO: 18): 5′ AGA CGT CGA CTC TAG ATG AAA TCG AAA TTC AGA GTT TTG ATA GTG AGA GC 3′

The TPT promoter was amplified using a “touchdown” PCR protocol with the use of the Advantage Genomic Polymerase Mix (Clontech Laboratories, Inc; Catalogue No. #8418-1). The above-mentioned polymerase mix contains a thermostable DNA polymerase from Thermus thermophilus (Tth DNA polymerase), mixed with a smaller proportion of Vent proofreading 3′-5′ polymerase, and the Tth start antibody which makes hot-start PCR possible.

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   36.8 μl H₂O     -   5 μl 10× reaction buffer (“genomic PCR”)     -   1 μl dNTP mix (10 mM each)     -   2.2 μl. 25 mM Mg(OAc).sub.2 (final concentration 1.1 mM)     -   1 μl Primer L-FNR ara (10 μM)     -   1 μl Primer R-FNR ara (10 μM)     -   1 μl 50× polymerase mix     -   2 μl Genomic Arabidopsis DNA (approx. 500 ng)

PCR Conditions:

-   -   1 cycle at 94° C. for 1 min.     -   10 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s and 70° C. for 3 min.     -   32 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s and 65° C. for 3 min.     -   1 cycle at 65° C. for 4 min.—followed by cooling to 4° C. until         further use.

b) Construction of the TPT Promoter-GUS Expression Cassette.

After gel-electrophoretic fractionation and purification from the gel using the Quiagen PCR purification kit, the PCR product of the TPT promoter was cloned into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen) via TA cloning. The promoter fragment was then isolated from the resulting plasmid pATTPT by means of the SalI and XbaI restriction cleavage sites introduced by the pair of primers and purified by gel electrophoresis. For fusion with the GUS gene, the approx. 2.0 kb TPT promoter fragment was cloned into the SalI/XbaI-digested binary vector pBI101. The correct insertion of the correct fragment in the resulting plasmid pATTPT-Bi was then verified on the basis of a restriction analysis using the endonuclease HindIII. The plasmid pATTPT-Bi was used for transformation of tobacco.

For transformation in oilseed rape, the TPT promoter was cloned as SalI fragment of plasmid pATTPT into the vector pS3NitGUS cut with SalI and XhoI, thereby replacing the nitrilase promoter.

c) Construction of the TPT Promoter-PAT Expression Cassette.

In order to study the TPT promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to phosphinothricin, the TPT promoter was cloned as SalI fragment from plasmid pATTPT into the SalI-cut plasmid pSUN3 PatNos upstream of the phosphinothricin resistance gene. The resulting plasmid pSUN3TPTPat was used for transformation of tobacco using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA101. The tobacco plants were selectively regenerated either on phosphinothricin (5 mg/l) or, as a control, on kanamycin (100 mg/l).

d) Construction of the TPT Promoter-NptII Expression Cassette.

In order to impart resistance to kanamycin, the TPT promoter was cloned as SalI fragment into the Xha-cut dephosphorylated plasmid pSUN5NptIICat (Sungene GmbH & Co KGaA, SEQ ID NO: 24) upstream of the NPTII resistance gene. The resulting plasmid is referred to as pS5TPTNptII and was transformed into tobacco and oilseed rape.

e) Results of GUS Analysis of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

Qualitative Data

Transgenic TPT::GUS-tobacco plants displayed strong GUS expression in all green tissues, especially in source leaves, here in particular in the trichomes and the flower organs of young and fully developed flowers. GUS activity in the flower region was strongest in the ovaries and in the stigma; staining of the sepals and petals was somewhat weaker. The GUS activity was lowest in the anthers. No GUS activity was detected in the pollen. Transgenic oilseed rape plants showed the same staining pattern.

In the first analysis of leaf disks of 80 in vitro-plants, 22 plants showed no staining whatsoever and 22 plants showed strong GUS staining after staining for only 3 hours. The remaining plants displayed a good variety of GUS stainings of various intensities in the individual plants. In the tissue culture plants, the GUS activity of the TPT::GUS plants was markedly stronger than that of the FNR::GUS plants. Seed material (F1) of the lines TPT 55 and TPT 60 were analyzed with respect to their GUS activity. It turned out that strong, GUS activity was detected both in resting seeds and in growing seedlings (3.5 days after sowing). In later seedling stages (6 and 10 days after sowing), the strongest GUS activity was detected in cotyledons and in the upper region of the seedling axis and a weaker GUS staining in the roots. Seedlings which had been cultivated in the dark displayed an unchanged GUS staining pattern.

Quantitative Data

Quantitative analysis of the GUS activity in TPT::GUS transgenic tobacco plants (transformed with plasmid pAT-TPT-Bi) was carried out on the first fully developed leaves of tobacco plants 19 days after transfer from the tissue culture to the greenhouse. The data correspond to the average of four independent measurements.

TABLE 5 Quantification of GUS activity in leaf tissue of selected transgenic TPT::GUS tobacco plants (transformed with plasmid pAT-TPT-Bi). WT2: controls from untransformed wild-type plants. Rank (x-strongest GUS Activity TPT::GUS GUS activity (pmol 4-MU/mg Standard Plant no. among 50 plants) Protein/min) deviation 55  1st 62910 3576 15   2nd 58251 2533 10  5th 36759 1008 60 10th 19536 1783 56 11th 18876 1177 43 12th 18858 1404 27 35th 7390 233 44 59th 311 24 80-WT2 80th 5 13

Results of GUS Analysis of the Transgenic Potato Plants.

The analysis of putatively transgenic potato plants showed in 28 lines strong GUS staining in the leaves, comparable to the expression pattern of tobacco plants. A strong staining was likewise detected in the potato tubers of the transgenic plants. This demonstrates that the TPT promoter is expressed strongly and ubiquitously in potatoes, too.

g) Results of the Analysis of Phosphinothricin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

The plasmid pSUN3TPTPat was used for transformation of tobacco by using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA101, as described under 3. The tobacco plants are selectively regenerated either on phosphinothricin (5 mg/l) or, as a control, on kanamycin (100 mg/l). 97% of explants selected under kanamycin pressure and 70% of explants selected under phosphinothricin pressure developed plumulae. The plants regenerated under phosphinothricin pressure comprised both the kanamycin and the phosphinothricin gene, demonstrating that the TPT promoter had expressed the phosphinothricin acetyltransferase gene and thus made selection possible. Seeds of the transgenic tobacco plants were laid out on MS medium comprising 10 mg/l phosphinothricin and the rate of germination was determined. In contrast to the control of untransformed tobacco seeds, the seedlings developed normally. The gene of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, which had been transferred and expressed via the TPT promoter, was detected in the progeny of said lines by means of PCR. The results demonstrate that the isolated nucleic acid sequence has the desired advantageous promoter properties, i.e. it shows a promoter activity which is suitable for expressing selection markers effectively and has no activity in pollen.

h) Results of the Analysis of Kanamycin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco and Oilseed Rape Plants.

In order to study the TPT promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to kanamycin, the TPT promoter was combined with the NptII gene. The resulting construct pS5TPTNptII was transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 [mp 90] for transformation in tobacco and oilseed rape.

The resulting strains have been used for transformation, as described under Example 2. Selective regeneration was achieved in the presence of 100 mg/l (or 18 mg/l in the case of oilseed rape) kanamycin. The plants regenerated under kanamycin pressure comprised both the kanamycin and the phosphinothricin gene, demonstrating that the TPT promoter had expressed the NptII gene and thus made selection of the plants possible.

Seeds of the transgenic tobacco plants were laid out on MS medium comprising 100 mg/l kanamycin and the rate of germination was determined. In contrast to the control of untransformed tobacco seeds, the seedlings developed normally. The gene of neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII), which had been transferred and expressed via the TPT promoter, was detected in the progeny of said lines by means of PCR.

The results demonstrate that the isolated nucleic acid sequence has the desired advantageous promoter properties, i.e. it shows a promoter activity which is suitable for expressing selection markers effectively and has no activity in pollen.

i) Cloning of the Truncated TPT Promoter (STPT).

The truncated putative promoter region of the Arabidopsis thaliana TPT gene (STPT) was isolated from the plasmid pATTPT (SEQ ID NO: 27) by amplification by means of PCR using the primer 5-TPTara (SEQ-ID NO: 26) and R-TPTara (see above SEQ ID NO: 18).

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   37.8 μl H₂O     -   5 μl 10× Reaction buffer (“genomic PCR”)     -   1 μl dNTP mix (2.5 mM each)     -   2.2 μl 25 mM Mg(OAc).sub.2 (final concentration 1.1 mM)     -   1 μl Primer 5-TPTara (10 μM)     -   1 μl Primer R-TPTara (10 μM)     -   1 μl 50× polymerase mix (“Advantage Genomic Polymerase Mix”;         Clontech Lab., Inc.; Cat.-No.: #8418-1)     -   1 μpATTPT plasmid DNA (1 ng)

PCR Conditions:

-   -   1 cycle at 94° C. for 5 min     -   25 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s and 52° C. for 1 min.     -   1 cycle at 52° C. for 4 min., followed by cooling to 4° C. until         further use.

Promoter Primer 5-TPTara (SEQ ID NO: 26) 5′-AAG TCG ACG GAT CCT-GAT-AGC-TTA-TAC-TCA-AAT- TCA-ACA-AGT-TAT-3′

The 1.3 kb PCR product of the truncated TPT promoter was cloned, after gel-electrophoretic fractionation and purification from the gel, into the SmaI-cut and dephosphorylated vector pUC18, using the SureClone Ligation Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; Code-No.: 27-9300-01). The resulting plasmid is referred to as pATSTPT. The sequence was checked by means of sequencing.

j) Construction of the STPT Promoter-NptII Expression Cassette.

In order to impart resistance to kanamycin, the STPT promoter (SEQ ID NO: 27) was cloned as SalI fragment into the XhoI-cut dephosphorylated plasmid pSUN5NptIICat (Sungene GmbH & Co KGaA, SEQ ID NO: 24) upstream of the NptII resistance gene. The resulting plasmid is referred to as pS5STPTNptII and was transformed into tobacco and oilseed rape.

k) Results of the Analysis of Kanamycin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco and Oilseed Rape Plants.

In order to study the STPT promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to kanamycin, the plasmid pS5STPTNptII was transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 [mp 90] for transformation into tobacco and oilseed rape. The resulting strain has been used for transformation, as described under Example 2. Selective regeneration was achieved in the presence of 100 mg/l (or 18 mg/l for oilseed rape) kanamycin.

The results demonstrate that the isolated nucleic acid sequence has the desired advantageous promoter properties, i.e. it shows a promoter activity which is suitable for expressing selection markers effectively.

Example 6 Comparison of the Transformation Efficiencies of the FNR and TPT Promoters and of the NOS Promoter

In a comparative experiment, the efficiency of the transformation of tobacco was determined using the FNR promoter (FNR-P), the TPT promoter (TPT-P) and the Nos promoter (Nos-P). The promoters were, as described, fused in each case to the NptII gene. After the plumulae had formed and, respectively, the shoot had roots on kanamycin-comprising medium, the resistant transformants were counted and their numbers were compared. A PCR which was used to detect the NptII gene showed the high proportion of transgenic plants.

TABLE 6 Transformation efficiency NOS-P FNR-P TPT-P Shoot formation 100%  68% 76% Rooted plants 80% 81% 80% Transgenic plants 92% 100%  100% 

Comparative Example 1 Studies of the Suitability of the Ubiquitin Promoter

a) Cloning of the Ubiquitin Promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana.

The ubiquitin promoter was amplified from genomic Arabidopsis thaliana DNA by means of PCR using the primers ubi5 and ubi3.

ubi5 (SEQ ID NO: 19): 5′-CCAAACCATGGTAAGTTTGTCTAAAGCTTA-3-′ ubi3 (SEQ ID NO: 20): 5′-CGGATCCTTTTGTGTTTCGTCT-TCTCTCACG-3′

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   37.5 μl H₂O     -   5 μl 10× reaction buffer (“genomic PCR”)     -   4 μl dNTP mix (2.5 mM each)     -   2.2 μl 25 mM Mg(OAc)₂ (final concentration 1.1 mM)     -   1 μl Primer ubi3 (10 μM)     -   1 μl Primer ubi5 (10 μM)     -   0.5 μl Pfu-turbo polymerase mix     -   1 μl Genomic Arabidopsis DNA (ca. 250 ng)

PCR Conditions:

-   -   1 cycle at 94° C. for 5 min.     -   25 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s, 52° C. for 1 min. and 72° C. for 1         min.     -   1 cycle at 52° C. for 1 min. and 72° C. for 10 min, followed by         cooling to 4° C. until further use.

The resultant PCR fragment was cooled as HindIII/BamHI fragment into the HindIII/BamHI-cut plasmid pGUSINT37 (pUBI42GUS) and verified by means of sequence analysis.

b) Cloning of the Ubiquitin Promoter Upstream of the PAT Gene.

In order to study the ubiquitin promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to phosphinothricin, the ubiquitin promoter was cloned as BamHIII/HindIII fragment into the BamHI/HindIII-cut plasmid pSUN3 PatNos upstream of the phosphinothricin resistance gene. The resulting plasmid pSUN3UBIPat was used for transformation of tobacco using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA101. The tobacco plants were selectively regenerated either on phosphinothricin (5 mg/l) or, as a control, on kanamycin (100 mg/l).

c) Results of the Analysis of Phosphinothricin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

In contrast to selection on kanamycin, which was normal, no calli or shoots were obtained under selection on phosphinothricin. Thus, the ubiquitin promoter is unsuitable for expression of a selective marker for the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer with subsequent regeneration of tissues.

Comparative Example 2 Studies on the Suitability of the Squalene Synthase (SQS) Promoter

a) Cloning of the Squalene Synthase (SQS) Promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana

The squalene synthase promoter was amplified from genomic Arabidopsis thaliana DNA by means of PCR using the primers sqs5 and sqs3.

sqs5 (SEQ ID NO: 21): 5′-GTCTAGAGGCAAACCACCGAGTGTT-3′ sqs3 (SEQ ID NO: 22): 5′-CGGTACCTGTTTCCAGAAAAT-TTTGATTCAG-3′

Reaction Mixture:

-   -   37.5 μl H₂O     -   5 μl 10× Reaction buffer (“genomic PCR”)     -   4 μl dNTP mix (2.5 mM each)     -   2.2 ml 25 mM Mg(OAc)₂ (final concentration 1.1 mM)     -   1 μl Primer sqs3 (10 μM) (10 μM)     -   1 μl Primer sqs5 (10 μM)     -   0.5 μl Pfu-turbo polymerase mix     -   1 μl Genomic Arabidopsis DNA (approx. 250 ng)

PCR Conditions:

-   -   1 cycle at 94° C. for 5 min.     -   25 cycles at 94° C. for 30 s, 52° C. for 1 min. and 72° C. for 1         min.     -   1 cycle at 52° C. for 1 min. and 72° C. for 10 min., followed by         cooling to 4° C. until further use.

The resultant PCR fragment was cloned as XbaII/BamHI fragment into the XbaII/BamHI-cut plasmid pGUSINT37 (PSQSPGUS) and verified by means of sequence analysis.

b) Cloning of the Squalene Synthase Promoter Upstream of the PAT Gene.

In order to study the squalene synthase promoter-assisted imparting of resistance to phosphinothricin, the squalene synthase promoter was cloned as BamHI/SalI fragment into the BamHI/SaliI-cut plasmid pSUN3 PatNos upstream of the phosphinothricin resistance gene. The resulting plasmid pSUN3SQSPat was used for transformation of tobacco using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA101. The tobacco plants were selectively regenerated either on phosphinothricin (5 mg/l) or, as a control, on kanamycin (100 mg/l).

c) Results of the Analysis of Phosphinothricin Resistance of the Transgenic Tobacco Plants.

In contrast to selection on kanamycin, which was normal, no calli or shoots were obtained under selection on phosphinothricin. Thus, the ubiquitin promoter is unsuitable for expression of a selective marker for the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer with subsequent regeneration of tissues.

Comparative Example 3 Promoter Activity Assay of the Ubiquitin and Squalene Synthase-Promoter by Means of a Particle Gun

In order to assay the activity of the ubiquitin promoter and the squalene synthase promoter, sterile tobacco leaves were bombarded with plasmid DNA of plasmids pUBI42GUS, pSQSPGUS and pGUSINT37 by means of the BioRad Biolistics particle gun. In this connection, microcarriers (25 μg of Gold, Heraeus 0.3 to 3 μm) were treated with 10 μg of plasmid DNA, 2.5 M CaCl₂, and 0.1 M spermidine, washed with alcohol and fired at the leaves which were lying on MS agar medium under a vacuum of 26 inches and a pressure of 1100 psi. The explants were then incubated in MS medium comprising 2% sucrose for 24 h and then histochemically stained with X-gluc.

In contrast to the comparative construct pGUSINT37 in which the GUS gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter, the ubiquitin promoter and the squalene synthase promoter showed only very few and very weak GUS-stained dots. This indicates that the ubiquitin and squalene synthase promoter activities are distinctly weaker than the CaMV35S promoter activity.

Other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. All references cited herein, including all U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications, and all publications or other documentary materials, are specifically and entirely hereby incorporated herein by reference. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered exemplary only, with the true scope and spirit of the invention indicated by the following claims. 

We claim:
 1. An expression cassette for transgenic expression of nucleic acids, comprising: i) a promoter; and ii) a nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically which is operably linked to and heterologous in relation to said promoter; wherein the promoter comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or a fragment thereof, or a sequence having at least 99% identity to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 4, wherein said promoter or fragment thereof has constitutive promoter activity.
 2. The expression cassette of claim 1, wherein the fragment comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 4. 3. The expression cassette of claim 1, wherein: the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed is further operably linked to one or more genetic control sequences, or the expression cassette comprises one or more additional functional elements.
 4. The expression cassette of claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically enables: expression of a protein encoded by said nucleic acid sequence, or expression of a sense RNA, antisense RNA, or ribozyme encoded by said nucleic acid sequence.
 5. The expression cassette of claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically is selected from the group consisting of nucleic acids coding for selection markers, reporter genes, cellulases, chitinases, glucanases, ribosome-inactivating proteins, lysozymes, Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin, α-amylase inhibitor, protease inhibitors, lectins, RNAases, ribozymes, acetyl-CoA carboxylases, phytases, 2S albumin from Bertholletia excelsa, antifreeze proteins, trehalose phosphate synthase, trehalose phosphate phosphatase, trehalase, DREB 1A factor, farnesyl transferases, ferritin, oxalate oxidase, calcium-dependent protein kinases, calcineurins, glutamate dehydrogenases, N-hydroxylating multifunctional cytochrome P450, transcriptional activator CBF1, phytoene desaturases, polygalacturonases, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylases, dihydroflavanol 4-reductases, chalcone isomerases, chalcone synthases, flavanone 3-beta-hydroxylases, flavone synthase II, branching enzyme Q, starch branching enzyme, and combinations thereof.
 6. The expression cassette of claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically comprises a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, and 64; or a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, and
 63. 7. The expression cassette of claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically is selected from the group consisting of positive selection markers, negative selection markers, factors that provide a growth advantage and combinations thereof.
 8. The expression cassette of claim 7, wherein the positive or negative selection marker is selected from the group consisting of proteins that impart a resistance to antibiotics, metabolism inhibitors, herbicides, biocides and combinations thereof.
 9. The expression cassette of claim 7, wherein the positive or negative selection marker is selected from the group consisting of proteins that impart a resistance to phosphinothricin, glyphosate, bromoxynil, dalapon, 2-deoxyglucose 6-phosphate, tetracyclines, ampicillin, kanamycin, G418, neomycin, paromomycin, bleomycin, zeocin, hygromycin, chloramphenicol, sulfonyl urea herbicides, imidazolinone herbicides and combinations thereof.
 10. The transgenic expression cassette of claim 7, wherein the selection marker is selected from the group consisting of phosphinothricin acetyltransferases, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthases, glyphosate oxidoreductases, dehalogenases, nitrilases, neomycin phosphotransferases, 2-desoxyglucose 6-phosphate phosphatases, acetolactate synthases, hygromycin phosphotransferases, chloramphenicol acetyltransferases, streptomycin adenylyltransferases, β-lactamases, tetA genes, tetR genes, isopentenyl transferases, thymidine kinases, diphtheria toxin A, cytosine deaminase (codA), cytochrome P450, haloalkanedehalogenases, indole acetic acid hydrolases, indole acetimide hydrolases, β-glucuronidases, mannose 6-phosphate isomerases, uridine diphosphate-galactose 4-epimerases and combinations thereof.
 11. The transgenic expression cassette of claim 7, wherein the positive or negative selection marker is encoded by a nucleic acid comprising the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5, 65, 67, 69, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 79, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 101, 103, or 105; or a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6, 66, 68, 71, 73, 77, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 100, 102, 104, or
 106. 12. A vector comprising the expression cassette of claim
 1. 13. A transgenic organism transformed with a vector comprising the expression cassette of claim
 1. 14. The transgenic organism of claim 13, which is selected from the group of organisms consisting of bacteria, yeasts, fungi, animal, and plant organisms.
 15. The transgenic organism of claim 13, which is selected from the group of organisms consisting of Arabidopsis, tomato, tobacco, potatoes, corn, oilseed rape, wheat, barley, sunflowers, millet, beet, rye, oats, sugarbeet, bean plants and soybean.
 16. A cell culture, plant or transgenic propagation material, obtained from the transgenic organism of claim 13, wherein the cell culture, plant and transgenic propagation material comprise the expression cassette.
 17. A method for transgenic expression of a nucleic acid in an organism comprising: transgenically expressing a nucleic acid sequence in an organism, wherein said nucleic acid sequence is operably linked and heterologous to: (i) a promoter comprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or a fragment thereof; or (ii) a promoter having at least 99% identity to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 4, wherein said promoter or said fragment thereof of part (i) and the promoter of part (ii) have constitutive promoter activity.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the fragment contains the sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 4. 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed is further operably linked to one or more genetic control sequences, and one or more additional functional elements.
 20. The method of claim 17, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed is further operably linked to one or more genetic control sequences; or one or more additional functional elements.
 21. The method of claim 17, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically enables: expression of a protein encoded by said nucleic acid sequence, or expression of a sense RNA, antisense RNA, or ribozyme encoded by said nucleic acid sequence.
 22. The method of claim 17, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically is selected from the group consisting of nucleic acids coding for selection markers, reporter genes, cellulases, chitinases, glucanases, ribosome-inactivating proteins, lysozymes, Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin, α-amylase inhibitor, protease inhibitors, lectins, RNAases, ribozymes, acetyl-CoA carboxylases, phytases, 2S albumin from Bertholletia excelsa, antifreeze proteins, trehalose phosphate synthase, trehalose phosphate phosphatase, trehalase, DREB1A factor, farnesyl transferases, ferritin, oxalate oxidase, calcium-dependent protein kinases, calcineurins, glutamate dehydrogenases, N-hydroxylating multifunctional cytochrome P450, transcriptional activator CBF1, phytoene desaturases, polygalacturonases, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylases, dihydroflavanol 4-reductases, chalcone isomerases, chalcone synthases, flavanone 3-beta-hydroxylases, flavone synthase II, branching enzyme Q, starch branching enzyme, and combinations thereof.
 23. The method of claim 17, wherein the nucleic acid sequence to be expressed transgenically comprises a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, and 64; or a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, and
 63. 24. A method for selecting a transformed organism comprising: introducing a nucleic acid sequence coding for a selection marker to an organism, wherein said nucleic acid sequence is operably and transgenically linked to: (i) a promoter comprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or a fragment thereof; or (ii) a promoter having at least 99% identity to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 4, wherein said promoter or said fragment thereof of part (i) and the promoter of part (ii) have constitutive promoter activity; selecting a transformed organism expressing said selection marker; and isolating said selected transformed organism, and wherein said selected organism comprises said promoter of part (i) or part (ii).
 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the selection marker comprises a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, and 64; or a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, and
 63. 26. The method of claim 24, wherein the selection marker is selected from the group consisting of positive selection markers, negative selection markers, factors that provide a growth advantage, proteins that impart a resistance to antibiotics, metabolism inhibitors, herbicides, biocides, phosphinothricin acetyltransferases, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthases, glyphosate oxidoreductases, dehalogenases, nitrilases, neomycin phosphotransferases, 2-desoxyglucose 6-phosphate phosphatases, acetolactate synthases, hygromycin phosphotransferases, chloramphenicol acetyltransferases, streptomycin adenylyltransferases, β-lactamases, tetA genes, tetR genes, isopentenyl transferases, thymidine kinases, diphtheria toxin A, cytosine deaminase (codA), cytochrome P450, haloalkanedehalogenases, indole acetic acid hydrolases, indole acetimide hydrolases, β-glucuronidases, mannose 6-phosphate isomerases, uridine diphosphate-galactose 4-epimerases and combinations thereof.
 27. The expression cassette of claim 1, wherein the promoter is of a plant origin.
 28. A method for the production of a foodstuff, a feedstuff, or a seed comprising: providing a transgenic organism comprising an expression cassette for transgenic expression of nucleic acids wherein said nucleic acid is operably linked and heterologous to: (i) a promoter comprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or a fragment thereof; or (ii) a promoter having at least 99% identity to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 4, wherein said promoter or fragment thereof of part (i) and the promoter of part (ii) have constitutive promoter activity; propagating said transgenic organism or cell culture, part or transgenic propagation material obtained from said transgenic organism; and producing a foodstuff, a feedstuff, or a seed from said transgenic organism or cell culture, part or transgenic propagation material obtained from said transgenic organism, wherein said foodstuff, feedstuff, or seed from said transgenic organism, or cell culture, part or transgenic propagation material obtained from said transgenic organism comprise said expression cassette.
 29. A plant cell, plant or part thereof, or propagation material obtained therefrom, which plant cell, plant or part thereof, or propagation material derived therefrom comprises the expression cassette of claim
 1. 